Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

LABOR DEPARTMENT RELEASES MORE DETAILS ON PLANS TO SCRAP CURRENT LABOR CERTIFICATION PROCESS FOR GREEN CARD SEEKERS

For most individuals seeking to get permanent residency through means other than sponsorship from a family member, getting an employer to petition for a green card is the only feasible option. And for most of those people lucky enough to find a willing employer, the main option available is going through an onerous process called a labor certification. The labor certification is a process designed to ensure that immigrants do not take jobs away from Americans or otherwise make working conditions for American workers worse. Employers are required to advertise and use other recruiting tools to demonstrate that no minimally qualified American workers are immediately available to fill the position.

The system has been in place for two decades and is the source of considerable frustration. The process is cumbersome and slow – waits of several years are not uncommon. The Labor Department admits that the program has been criticized as being “complicated, costly and time consuming.” The DOL blames the problems on cuts in federal funding for the program.

The DOL is now getting ready to address the problems with a plan to dramatically simplify the process. Under the current system, State Employment and Security Agencies (SESAs) play a large role in overseeing the recruiting process and preparing the case for the regional DOL office.  Several layers of bureaucracy will basically be eliminated under the DOL plan:

-         The SESAs will only be involved in the process of determining prevailing wages.

-         The wage will be requested and received from the SESA before filing the case.

-         A new standardized form for prevailing wages will be used by all SESAs.

-         In most cases, the SESA will assign the prevailing wage rate and appropriate skill level for the job opportunity from the wage component of the Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) survey.

-         The employer will also have the option of submitting an alternative source for the wage. The SESA is still charged with evaluating the alternate information to determine if it is in compliance with the DOL’s standards.

-         The DOL may set up a system to appeal negative SESA determinations on alternate wage submissions.

-         The employer will be required to conduct an adequate test of the labor market for qualified US applicants at prevailing wages and working conditions during the six month period preceding the filing of the application.

-         The specific mandatory and voluntary recruitment steps that must be taken will be set out  later on by the DOL in regulations, but the agency anticipates that they will be consistent with current Reduction in Recruitment rules.

-         The employer will be responsible for maintaining documentation of the recruiting efforts.

-         After the recruitment is finished, the employer will submit the application directly to an ETA processing center.

-         The labor certification application will probably be machine-readable or directly completed in a web-based environment to eliminate the time-consuming data entry by ETA processing centers.

-         After the application is received, a computer will review it to look for certain “red flags” that may indicate that in-depth review or audit is warranted.  Also, a small percentage of cases will be pulled for random auditing.

-         If an audit is not triggered, then the case will be immediately certified and returned to the employer.

-         The employer may then submit the certified application to the INS along with an I-140 petition.

-         If the application is flagged for an audit, the employer will be requested to provide documentation verifying the information in the petition.

-         After the audit, the case will either be certified, denied, or set for supervised recruitment. The supervised recruitment process will probably look similar to a normal non-RIR labor certification application under the current system.

We will closely monitor the development of this major new system. The next step will be the promulgation of proposed regulations, though the DOL is not saying when that will happen.

 

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.