Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

FOES OF BILINGUAL EDUCATION CITE RECENT TEST SCORES TO BOLSTER POSITION; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO DRAMATICALLY INCREASE THE NUMBER OF TRANSLATED DOCUMENTS

Two years ago, California voters went to the ballot box to formally bar school districts from offering bilingual schooling to immigrant children. Critics of the measure warned that immigrant students would fall behind and catastrophic results would ensue.

Now proponents of the measure are citing new test results in California claiming that not only are immigrant students not falling behind, but that the students are doing even better than before. Scores for students classified as limited in English increased by 9% over the last two years and rankings increased from the 19th percentile nationally to the 28th percentile. Math scores increased by 14 points from the 27th percentile to the 41st.

Voters in Arizona will soon be taking up the issue and anti-bilingual forces are working to get the issue on the ballot in Massachusetts and New York. Many people in those states are closely watching California, which has one-tenth of the nation’s schoolchildren, to see if their experiment is successful.

Some critics of bilingual education have reversed their positions as the results have come in. Ken Noonan, the founder of the California Association of Bilingual Educators, recently came full-circle in his position and now is a supporter of the ballot measure. Noonan was shocked at how much faster kids learned English when fully immersed in the language.

Some, however, claim that it is too early to conclude that bilingual education was a failure. Critics of the measure claim that California schools are merely emphasizing standardized exams more and have modified curricula to be geared toward preparing students for the tests.

In related news, President Clinton has issued an Executive Order calling on government agencies to dramatically increase the number of documents translated into foreign languages. Administration officials are worried that the government is not adequately serving many people who do not have strong English skills. Nearly 14% of households in the US, according to the Census Bureau, speak a foreign language at home.

Many of the newly translated documents will cover education and health. The move is being hailed by groups like the National Association for Bilingual Education. Opponents of bilingual education and other groups calling for English to be the official language of the United States attacked the plan, claiming that it will be extremely expensive and lead to the “balkanization” of America. Opponents also cited politics as a factor in the timing of the announcement. Latino voters are expected to be one of the most important voting groups in the upcoming national elections.

The Executive Order can be found online at http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov/uri-res/12R?urn:pdi://oma.eop.gov.us/2000/8/11/2.text.1

 

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.