Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

TIGHTER BORDER ENFORCEMENT PUSHES COURTS TO BREAKING POINT

There are five federal judicial districts along the US border with Mexico.  Over the past few years, as Congress has dramatically increased law enforcement in this area to combat both undocumented migration and illegal drugs, these districts have experienced just as dramatic an increase in their caseloads.  These five districts – there are 94 in the entire country – account for 26 percent of all criminal cases filed in federal courts.

Because of the strain, judges are being called in from as far away as New England, and others who would have retired are being forced to stay on the job.  Federal prosecutors, in an effort to deal with the crisis, have begun referring some low level offenses to state prosecutors.  This effort almost backfired when district attorneys in Texas threatened to refuse to prosecute any more cases unless the federal government reimbursed them for the costs of the prosecutions.  Congress authorized an emergency appropriation of $12 million for this.

While the law enforcement presence on the border has more than doubled since 1994, the court system has grown by only four percent.  There are many reasons for this.  First is the shortsightedness typical of so many politicians.  They are often eager to address a problem, such as the war on drugs or undocumented immigration, but fail to think about the consequences of such action.  Another reason rests with the historic dislike Congress has for the federal judiciary.  Federal judges are political appointees who have lifetime tenure.  This dislike is even more pronounced among Republicans, who have controlled Congress since 1996.

Last year Congress did create three new federal judgeships in Arizona.  However, like many judicial positions across the country, they have remained vacant.  Last month three Senators, Republicans Pete Domenici of New Mexico and Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas, and Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California introduced a bill that would create eight new permanent judgeships on the border as well as five temporary positions.  They are trying to inset the proposal into appropriations legislation.

Another problem, for which there is currently no proposed solution, is the overcrowding of jails and prisons in the border region.  There is no federal detention center on the Southwest border, so those being held on federal charges must be kept in local facilities.  While the federal government does reimburse local jails for housing federal detainees, the reimbursement does not always cover all the costs involved.

 

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.