Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

Click for more articlesCOURT HEARING THIS WEEK IN ELIAN GONZALEZ CASE

The long anticipated hearing in front of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on whether the INS improperly rejected the asylum applications filed for Elian Gonzalez occurred last Thursday.  Oral arguments lasted almost an hour and a half, much longer than was originally scheduled.  In an unusual move, one of the judges addressed the courtroom before the hearing began, reminding the spectators that the questions that would be asked could not be taken as indicative of a position on the case.

Attorneys for the Miami family argued that the INS failed to follow its own guidelines when it rejected the asylum applications.  They said that Elian understood the request for asylum, and that there is no age limit on asylum applicants. 

Greg Craig, the attorney representing Elian’s father, Juan Miguel Gonzalez, stated that at no point had the Cuban government pressured him to make a decision, and that he has always been free to make his own choice in matters relating to his son.

Government lawyers argued that the INS acted within the law in rejecting the asylum applications.  They added that going against Juan Miguel Gonzalez’ wishes in this case would constitute “a fundamental attack on the relationship between a parent and a child.” 

The judges said they would put their opinion on the case on a fast track, but warned that it would still take several weeks for a decision to be released.  After the opinion is announced, either party can request that the case be reheard by a 12 judge panel of the Eleventh Circuit, and if that request is denied, would be able to appeal to the Supreme Court. 

Transcripts of the oral argument are available online at:

http://www.accessatlanta.com/partners/ajc/newsatlanta/elian/atlanta/transcript.html

The uproar over this case has led the INS to reexamine many of its procedures, in particular the practice of placing juveniles with family members.  During the course of the investigation, some interesting facts have come out.  When Elian first arrived in the US, he was taken to a Miami area hospital.  The doctor who was caring for Elian had spoken with Juan Miguel Gonzalez before the INS ever contacted the family in Miami.  The INS maintains that even if it had known this at the time, it would not have changed its decision to place Elian with family in Miami.

Meanwhile, some politicians continue to make the situation a high priority.  Sen. Bob Smith (R-NH) has come under some scrutiny for comments he made about the situation.  In a town hall meeting last week he is reported to have said that Elian is being held in a “concentration camp” and made reference to his belief that Elian is being brainwashed, possibly with the aid of tranquilizers.  Asked later about his statements, Sen. Smith said he did not mean to imply that anyone is drugging Elian, and also said that he should not have used the phrase “concentration camp” to describe the Wye River Plantation outside Washington, D.C. where Elian is staying during the court battle. 

Click for more articles

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.