Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

FORMER DIRECTOR OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN SUES OVER VISA FEE MISAPPROPRIATION

A former director of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) has filed a whistleblower lawsuit in which he accuses employees there of selling US visas and keeping the fees.  James C. Wood, who was the AIT director from 1996 to 1997, says that more than $5 million in visa fees are missing, and uses an audit from a private accounting firm to support his claim.  The audit showed that visa fees were not kept separate, as required by the State Department, but were mixed with other income.  According to the audit, there were $9.3 million in visa fees collected between 1992 and 1995, for which $5.3 million cannot be accounted.

The suit, which was filed in October, alleges that AIT officers sold visas to ineligible recipients, at a cost of up to $25,000.  The proper visa fee is $10.  It also alleges that some officers demanded sex from female applicants, and threatened to deny issuing visas to qualified applicants unless they agreed.  The suit seeks the repayment of the missing funds and damages for what Wood says are “false statements” that were made in an effort to force him to resign.

Wood ordered the audit shortly after becoming the director.  He says that this is when the problems first began.  AIT employees refused to turn over financial records to the auditors, telling them that they had been “eaten by termites.”

The AIT is not an official US Consulate.  The US and Chinese governments have an agreement that the US will not officially recognize Taiwan.  AIT is a private, non-profit agency that has a contract with the State Department to process visa applications, as well as conduct trade and commercial functions that a consulate would perform.  Despite its non-official status, the State and Justice Departments have filed motions to dismiss the case.  They argue that AIT is essentially a government agency and enjoys immunity from lawsuits.  Wood has countered this effort by pointing out that if the agency enjoys immunity, then it is essentially a US government entity, and is therefore in violation of the agreement that the US will not recognize Taiwan.

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.