Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

Click for more articlesBILL INTRODUCED TO RESTORE DUE PROCESS TO IMMIGRATION LAW

Representative Barney Frank (D-MA) this week introduced a bill that would call for substantial reform to US deportation law.  Sixteen co-sponsors joined Frank in making his announcement, including the Florida Republican Lincoln Diaz-Balart.

The bill, H.R. 1452, called the Family Reunification Act of 2001, would restore many of the laws dealing with deportation to their pre-1996 state, when immigration judges had a great deal more discretion in making decisions regarding deportation.  Frank introduced similar legislation last year, which ended up with over 80 cosponsors.  While there was never a vote on that bill, toward the end of the session the House of Representatives did approve a bill that would have done many of the same things.  The Senate failed to act on that bill.

The bill would allow people who have lived in the US for seven years, at least five as a permanent resident, to apply for cancellation of removal.  For purposes of cancellation, which is unavailable to people convicted of aggravated felonies, a crime would be considered an aggravated felony only if it resulted in at least five years in prison.  The bill would authorize the INS to release people in deportation proceedings who have applied for cancellation if they demonstrate that they are not a flight risk and will not be a danger to the community.

A special kind of cancellation of removal would be created that would allow a person who would not ordinarily be eligible because of a criminal conviction to apply for cancellation because of humanitarian concerns.

The bill eliminates the stop time rule, which currently states that the time a person has spent in the US necessary for eligibility for cancellation terminates when they are placed in deportation proceedings.  It also eliminates the retroactive application of the expanded grounds of deportation, so that people convicted of criminal offenses that were not aggravated felonies before the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act was passed cannot now be placed in proceedings as an aggravated felon.  They would be allowed to apply for any relief from removal for which they were eligible at the time of the offense.

Finally, the bill would allow people who become eligible for relief under it to reopen their cases, even if they have already been deported.
 

Click for more articles

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.