Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

Click for more articlesASK VISALAW.COM

by Marc Topoleski, Partner in SSHD's Detroit, Michigan office.

Do I have to work for my employer in H-1B status for one year before starting the green card process? 

There is no requirement under immigration law that requires a company or individual to wait a certain period of time after entering the US in H-1B status before pursuing Permanent Residence.  Under the immigration laws, the nonimmigrant and immigrant visa systems are virtually separate, and if an employer is willing and able, the process of green card sponsorship can be started at any time.  One should note, however, that employer sponsorship generally requires you to stay with that employer until the green card is finally issued.  And, due to the current uncertainty in processing delays, it is probably best to begin as soon as you and your employer are comfortable that the employment relationship is going to be long-term.

I am an H-1B visa holder.  If I get laid off, is it true that there is a 10-day grace period for me to remain in legal H-1B status after leaving my sponsoring employer? 

This is probably one of the most popular misconceptions in immigration law.  Technically, there is a 10-day grace period for a person to legally remain in the US beyond the expiration of their period of authorized stay, as indicated on the individual’s I-94 card.  This 10-day grace period does not apply in situations where your employment ends prior to the end of the I-94 period, as in a layoff situation.  In this situation, you are out of status as of the date your employment is terminated.  Therefore, if you feel you are in danger of being laid off, you should take steps to obtain an alternative status, whether through a new employer or in a different visa category, prior to being laid off so you do not experience a lapse in status.

If an individual or employer decides to file a petition with the INS for permanent residence for either themselves or their employee before April 30, 2001 to take advantage of the temporary restoration of Section 245(i) under the LIFE Act, are they putting themselves at risk for INS problems?

Conceivably, the INS, in the case of an I-130 petition, or the DOL, in the case of a Labor Certification, could use information contained in a filing to scrutinize an individual’s or employer’s legal status.  However, in practice, this very rarely occurs.  The INS service personnel and enforcement personnel operate almost exclusively in an independent fashion, making it highly unlikely that the two branches would share information.  The enforcement division of INS has stated on numerous occasions that its highest priority is going after criminal aliens, and that realistically it just does not have the resources to conduct investigations of individuals or employers based on information contained in immigration filings.  Employees should be cautioned that if an employer learns that you are out of status and was not aware that this was the case, you may find yourself out of work.

Click for more articles

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.