Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

Click for more articlesHOUSE VOTES TO EXTEND SECTION 245(I) DEADLINE

On Monday the House of Representatives voted 336 to 43 to extend the section 245(i) deadline four months.  The section expired on April 30, 2001, and the extension would reopen the law until August 31, 2001.  President Bush, who has said he would support a longer extension, is expected to sign the bill, H.R. 1885, assuming the Senate passes it.  Democratic House leader Richard Gephardt (D-MO) has said he would support a 12-month extension.  In testimony before Congress this month, Acting INS Commissioner Kevin Rooney said the agency supports a six to 12 month extension, in large part because it took the agency so long to release implementing regulations.

The bill was passed through an expedited process that limited debate to 40 minutes.  This was, according to a spokesperson for House Majority Leady Richard Armey (D-TX), because of wide bipartisan agreement on the need for an extension.  Under the expedited rules, the bill had to pass by a two-thirds majority, which it easily did.

A number of House Democrats, however, were concerned that the four-month period will not be sufficient for all eligible applicants to take advantage of section 245(i).  Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX), the ranking Democrat on the House Immigration Subcommittee, expressed concern that the deadline would occur when the House was debating funding for the federal government, before the Congress could provide increased funding to deal with the many expected applications.  Also unpopular with many is the requirement that the qualifying family or employment relationship have been created before April 30, 2001.

When the Legal Immigration and Family Equity Act (LIFE Act) was enacted last December, about 640,000 immigrants who would not otherwise be eligible to apply for adjustment of status were thought to be eligible.  The INS estimates that about 200,000 eligible people missed the deadline.  To be eligible to apply under the extended version of section 245(i), the applicant must have been in the US on December 21, 2000.  They must also have been offered the qualifying job, or entered into the qualifying family relationship, before April 30, 2001.

A bill in the Senate, introduced by Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) would extend the section 245(i) deadline for six months, until October 31, 2001.  Hagel has said that four months is not a sufficient extension.

Click for more articles

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.