Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR FINDS EMPLOYER LIABLE FOR $1 MILLION FOR LABOR CONDITION APPLICATION VIOLATIONS

For every H-1B petition an employer files, there must be a valid labor condition application (LCA).  This form is used by the Department of Labor to ensure both that employers do not use foreign workers to depress wages, and that the foreign workers are not exploited by their employers.  The LCA system is not independently policed, and the Department of Labor will generally get involved in an investigation only if complaints are made.  In a recent case, the Labor Department investigated a physician in Tennessee for numerous LCA violations.  In one of the biggest such rulings ever, the physician, Mohan Kutty, was ordered to pay more than $1 million in back wages to 17 doctors, in addition to fines of more than $100,000.

Dr. Kutty had a successful practice in Florida.  Seeking to expand his business, in 1998, he began work in Tennessee by opening a clinic in a rural area.  According to his statements during the investigation, he expected the clinic to lose money for a few years, and planned to use his income from Florida to subsidize the Tennessee business.  Eventually he opened five clinics and signed employment contracts with 18 doctors.  Each contract was for three or five years, and was made contingent on the physician receiving a license to practice medicine in Tennessee.  Each contract called for an annual salary of $80,000.

All but one of the doctors had entered the US on J-1 visas, and had obtained waivers of the home residency requirement based on their promise to work for three years in a medically underserved area.  After obtaining the waiver, INS regulations require them to begin work, in H-1B status, within 90 days of receiving it.

After a couple of years, it became clear that the Tennessee clinics were losing money.  Dr. Kutty accused the physicians of trying to undermine his business, and began withholding their salaries.  Eight of the doctors retained an attorney, who demanded their full salaries.  At this point, Dr. Kutty stopped paying them altogether.  Even before then, he had been paying the doctors well less than the $80,000 specified in the contracts, and below the $115,000 rate specified in the LCAs filed with the Department of Labor.  The eight then filed a complaint with the Labor Department.

During the Labor Department’s investigation, investigators found that Dr. Kutty did not maintain the public access files required under law, nor were LCAs posted as required.  Back wages and penalties were calculated, and the matter was set for a hearing. 

At the hearing, Dr. Kutty argued that because there is a one-year statute of limitations on Labor Department investigations, back pay and penalties could not be assessed except for the one year period before the complaint was filed on February 28, 2001.  The officer hearing the case disagreed, finding that the statute of limitations referred to the time in which a complain must be filed, not the time in which back pay can be awarded.  The officer also rejected the argument that because the doctors were either not yet eligible to work or were not working full time as a reason to withhold salary.  This is clear from the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act, when the practice of “benching,” placing an H-1B employee on leave and not paying them, was specifically prohibited.  Under the law, unless the employee is not working because of “non-work-related factors” the employee must be paid as specified in the LCA.  Nor, the officer found, was low clinic income or failure by the doctors to abide by the terms of their contracts a legal basis for withholding wages. 

The officer also found that in a number of cases, Dr. Kutty had improperly retaliated against the doctors who filed complaints with the Labor Department by withholding salary and firing them.  There were also numerous violations of regulations requiring the employer to maintain public records, for which each violation received a $800 fine.  In addition, many violations were found to be willful.  In short, Dr. Kutty never intended to pay the doctors the wages stated on the LCAs.  For each of these violations, a fine of $4,000 was assessed.  In addition to the fines, Dr. Kutty was barred from petitioning for an H-1B visa for two years. 

http://www.ilw.com/lawyers/immigdaily/dol_news/2002,1022-kutty.pdf

< BackIndex | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.