Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

NEWS FROM THE COURTS

Moussa v. INS, Eighth Circuit

In this case, the court found that the respondent was a US citizen and therefore could not be deported. 

Gamal Adbi Moussa was placed in deportation proceedings in 1999 based on several criminal convictions.  He tried to avoid deportation by asserting a claim to US citizenship.  He had been born in Ethiopia in 1977.  In 1981, while he and his mother remained in Ethiopia, his father entered the US as a refugee.  The next year, his parents divorced, and in 1989, Moussa came to the US to live with his father.  Also in 1989, his parents were remarried through a proxy ceremony, but did not resume a shared life, as the mother remained in Ethiopia.  In 1992, his father became a citizen of the US.  At that time, immigration laws provided that a minor child would derive citizenship through a parent’s naturalization if the child is in the legal custody of the naturalizing parent following a legal separation.  Because of his parent’s remarriage, there was an issue about whether there was an effective legal separation.  The INS argued that there was not, that that Moussa therefore did not derive citizenship through his father’s naturalization.  An immigration judge disagreed, but on appeal, the Board of Immigration Appeals sided with the INS.  Moussa then appealed to the Eighth Circuit.

On appeal, Moussa argued that the 1989 proxy marriage did not terminate his parents’ legal separation, because it was not consummated until after his father was naturalized.  He pointed out that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not consider a proxy marriage to be legal until it is consummated.  The government argued that the court did not have jurisdiction over the case, but the court found that it did because the issue was not whether Moussa had committed deportable offenses, but whether he was an alien subject to deportation. 

On the merits, the court agreed with Moussa.  The fact that his parents had previously been married did not change the fact that the proxy marriage was not legal for immigration purposes until it was consummated.  Therefore, the court vacated the Board’s decision and declared Moussa a US citizen. 

The opinion is available online at http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/8th/013156p.pdf.

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.