Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

Justice Department Report Shows INS is Failing in Removing Deported Aliens from the US

The Department of Justice's Office of Inspector General has issued a report noting that most aliens facing removal orders from the US are not ultimately removed by the INS when they are not detained. Only 13% of immigrants ordered removed who are not detained by the INS actually leave, according to the OIG. But when the INS actually detained a person, the rate of actual removal jumps to 92%. According to the report, immigrants ordered removed

 

• from countries that the U.S. Department of State identified as sponsors of terrorism – only 6 percent of those ordered removed were actually removed,

 

• with criminal records – only 35 percent of those ordered removed were actually removed, and

 

• who were denied asylum – only 3 percent of those ordered removed actually left.

 

The OIG was especially blunt in criticizing the INS for not following recommendations from an earlier report that were intended to address this problem. 

 

For example, the INS agreed to improve its methods of notifying aliens of their duty to surrender for removal. The INS published a proposed rule, but allowed it to lapse. After September 11th attacks, the INS revived the rule. As of last month, the rule was still not finalized.

 

According to the OIG, the INS agreed to conduct field tests to target for removal all aliens with final orders. They told the OIG that a pilot project in Philadelphia had gone well. However, the INS was not able to provide any information regarding the pilot project in Philadelphia or other  locations and they could not locate anyone who could remember the projects.

 

The INS contracted with the Vera Institute of Justice to conduct a demonstration project to examine whether a supervised release program could improve court appearance rates for asylum seekers, criminal aliens, and undocumented workers. The final project report was issued on August 1, 2000, but as of December 2002, the

INS had not acted on it or implemented any alternative actions to improve the removal rates for nondetained aliens.

 

And finally, according to the report, the INS agreed to use an FY 1996 budget enhancement of $11.2 million to fund 142 positions to remove alien absconders. It also agreed to use the INS’s Law Enforcement Support Center to enter alien absconder information into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) and develop an automated list of criminal absconders for the law enforcement community. However, the INS did not establish absconder removal teams or develop an automated list of absconders until after September 11, 2001. Moreover, the INS was unable to document how it used the $11.2 million.

 

The report can be found online at http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/inspection/I-2003-004/final.pdf

 

 

< BackIndex | Next >

 

Print This Page

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.