Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Case Involving Detention of Permanent Residents Prior To Deportation

This week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case involving the indefinite detention of permanent residents. In 1996, Congress passed new laws dealing with detention and deportation of noncitizens who have committed crimes in the US. In 2001, the Supreme Court ruled that people ordered deported, but who cannot be deported because their countries of nationality refused to accept them cannot be indefinitely detained, and must be provided the opportunity to demonstrate that they deserve to be released.

The current case, involving Hyung Joon Kim, a permanent resident from
South Korea, addresses whether the INS can detain permanent residents who have not yet been ordered deported without providing them a bond hearing to determine whether they are a flight risk or a threat to the community. A lower court judge found Kim’s detention unconstitutional and ordered the INS to grant a bond hearing, but the INS simply released him on $50,000 bond without a hearing, a fact that Kim’s attorneys say shows that the government does not consider him either a danger or a flight risk.

At the hearing, government lawyers argued that the case is about public safety and security, and that those being detained have been convicted of crimes that mean they no longer have the right to live in the
US. At least two members of the court seemed to agree with the government’s position. Justice Antonin Scalia called the detention law not “terribly unreasonable,” and Chief Justice William Rhenquist said the law was valid in light of evidence that showed more than 20 percent of those released had failed to appear for deportation proceedings.

Lawyers for Kim argued that while some people the government seeks to deport might be dangerous and fail to appear for hearings, this is not the case for all of them, and that there should therefore be individual hearings to determine whether a person should be released. They also added that not everyone the government places in deportation proceedings ends up being ordered deported.

A decision is expected sometime this summer.

 

 

< BackIndex | Next >

 

Print This Page

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.