Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

Panel Finds Officials Could Have Prevented 9/11 Attacks

For the past two years, US officials have contended that immigration officials had no reason to suspect the September 11 hijackers, who legally entered and resided in the US.  However, in the seventh hearing held by the September 11th Commission, the body found that the US government repeatedly missed opportunities to prevent thirteen of the September 11 hijackers from entering the US.  The report issued by the panel found that immigration agents missed false passports, none of the hijackers filled out their visa forms correctly and that at least three lied on their forms.

 

The passports belonging to eight of the nineteen hijackers had evidence of “fraudulent manipulation” and five had “suspicious indicators.”  The report also said that six hijackers, including Mohammad Atta, violated immigration laws either while residing in the US or when entering the US.  Five of these were individually questioned by officials, but were eventually allowed to enter the US.  Atta was admitted to the US on a tourist visa, despite informing an inspection officer that he was a student in the US.  Six of the hijackers had overstayed their visas.

 

The panel was informed that the hijackers had an easy time entering the country because consular and inspection officials were trying to identify those individuals who might try to settle in the US.  Identifying terrorists was not a priority.

 

The report did point out that at least five suspected al Qaeda members were prevented from joining the 9/11 plot.  Four were denied visas, and a fifth, Mohamed al Qahtani, was sent back to Saudi Arabia.  Al Qahtani made his way to Afghanistan, where he was captured; he is now being held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

 

Jose Melendez-Perez, the Orlando, FL official who inspected al Qahtani testified that al Qahtani had no return ticket or hotel reservations, and also refused to identify a friend who would provide him with money and assistance on his trip.  Melendez-Perez stated that al Qahtani reminded him of a ‘hit man’, because “a ‘hit man' doesn’t know where he is going because if he is caught, that way he doesn’t have any information to bargain with.”  Officials believe al Qahtani’s ‘friend’ to be Atta, who was caught on an airport security camera complaining because his friend had been refused entry to the US.

 

Officials believe that al Qahtani was the “twentieth” hijacker – a theory that explains why one of the planes had four hijackers, while the others had five on board.  Officials theorize that because Flight 93 had only four hijackers, the passengers were able to overcome their attackers and crash the plane in Pennsylvania, instead of a suspected target in Washington, DC.

 

< BackIndex | Next >

 

Print This Page

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.