Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

Government Cracking Down on Old Removal Cases

Critics of the Alien Absconder Apprehension Initiative claim the program is tearing apart families as the government is enforcing old removal orders.  The crackdown began in 2002 against immigrants from predominantly Muslim countries, and last June, incorporated those convicted of crimes.  Recently, the Initiative has shifted to anyone who has violated immigration rules.

 

Many of the immigrants that are facing removal did not realize that there was an order of removal pending against them.  A number of individuals are being arrested and deported years after the order of removal was finalized, leaving their families scattered around the globe.

 

According to a government study of the issue, approximately two-thirds of orders were issued in absentia when the immigrant failed to show up for a hearing.  While some of the immigrants fled the country, a majority of the files were simply hampered by wrong addresses, backlog, and other problematic data, leaving the former INS plagued with incidents of failing to notify immigrants of hearings and of removal orders. 

 

The crackdown is intended to improve the immigration department’s track record of deporting only 13 percent of those who were not detained when they were ordered removed.  Immigration and Customs Enforcement stated that the operation was simply an overdue enforcement of existing laws. 

 

Once an immigrant has a final order of removal on file, they are not entitled to a hearing or a bond because they are deemed to have already exhausted their due process rights by not being present at the hearing.

 

< BackIndex

 

Print This Page

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.