Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

USCIS Chief Counsel Memo Regarding NSEERS Gives Hope

A memo from USCIS Chief Counsel Robert Divine states that a willful and unexcused failure to comply with NSEERS, commonly known as special registration, or the presence of any other ground of inadmissibility, would not justify the denial of an immigrant benefit petition separate from a request for a visa, admission or status.

 

The memo follows an April 2, 2004 Bill Yates memo that outlined the necessary compliance with NSEERS for an immigrant to be eligible for immigration benefits such as approval of visa petition. USCIS adjudicators routinely ask for proof of NSEERS registration in requests for additional evidence in all cases that they adjudicate and have erroneously denied petitions based on failure to register. However, the new Divine memo clearly states that even the willful and unexcused failure to comply with NSEERS cannot be used by USCIS in order to deny a benefit petition filed on behalf of that person, such as an I-130 family based petition, I-140 employment based petition or I-360 special immigrant petition. That is because the legal issue of whether a person is eligible for a benefit is narrower and different from the issue of whether such person is admissible to the United States.

 

The memo explains further that in immigrant and nonimmigrant applications, USCIS has limited discretion in adjudicating the case. For example, an I-130 family based immigrant visa application must be approved if a requisite family relationship exists between the petitioner and beneficiary. When the elements of the petitions are proven, USCIS must approve those petitions. A similar scenario applies to I-140, I-360 and I-526 applications as well as all non-immigrant visa applications.

 

However, whether a person later may be admitted into the U.S. as an immigrant or non-immigrant, or whether that person is qualified for change or extension of nonimmigrant status or other benefits, such as adjustment of status, may still require proof of NSEERS registration, because a willful and unexcused failure to register is a ground of inadmissibility. Therefore, examiners may notate on the visa approval that the beneficiary may have an apparent NSEERS violation or a possible ground of inadmissibility.

 

USCIS must also prove the “willful and unexcused” provision. If the person shows that he or she did not willfully violated the NSEERS provisions, he or she may be excused.

 

 

 

Written by Karen Weinstock, Managing attorney of Siskind Susser’s Atlanta, GA office, and Tovah R. Ackerman, Paralegal in the Atlanta, GA office.

 

< BackIndex | Next >

 

Print This Page

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.