Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

Congress Fails to Pass Worker Visa Relief

Congress has quietly dropped a section of the budget savings bill passed this weekend that would have raised more than a half billion dollars and offered relief to backlogs in the H-1B non-immigrant program and in employment-based green card categories. The measure had been included in a Senate version of the bill, but the House version of the budget bill only had a provision calling for a tax on L-1 visas. Several Republican members the House of Representatives, the chamber that holds more hostile views on immigration, threatened to vote against the compromise bill if the immigration provisions were not dropped. All immigration provisions, including the House’s L-1 visa tax, were stripped out of the bill at the last moment.

 

The bill would have made the following reforms:

 

H-1B visas reform

 

Changes to the H-1B program would have included the following:

 

  1. The proposal would recapture unused H-1B numbers that were not used in prior fiscal years when the H-1B cap is reached up to a maximum of 30,000 in any particular year. The recapture period would go back to 1991, the first year there was an H-1B cap.
  2. These “bonus” H-1Bs accompanied by a recapture fee of $500 per visa. An estimated $150 would be raised through such a fee over a five year period.

 

Employment-based green card changes

 

The proposal would have made several key reforms to employment-based green card filing including the following:

 

  1. Unused employment-based green cards would be recaptured from prior fiscal years with a maximum of 90,000 issued in any year. There are currently about 90,000 visas that could be reclaimed. The 50,000 green cards reserved for Schedule A occupations (mainly nurses) earlier this year would remain untouched.
  2. The plan calls for the removal of spouses and children from the counting of employment-based green cards. About 2.5 green cards are issued for family members for every principal applicant claiming an employment-based green card. This is currently the case for non-immigrant visa categories with caps.
  1. Employment-based green card applicants would be eligible to file for adjustment of status even if a visa is not currently available
  2. A fee of $500 would be imposed on most employment-based green card categories. An estimated $150 would be raised through such a fee.

 

L-1 visa reform

 

The House and Senate each approved provisions to tax L-1s between $750 and $1500.

 

The House is not expected to include these provisions in its version of the budget bill.

 

Groups that pushed for the legislation vow to bring the measure up again early in the new calendar year when Congress returns from its Christmas recess.

 

< BackIndex

 

Print This Page

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.