Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

New Jersey Supreme Court Issues Opinion on Immigration Representatives

The Supreme Court of New Jersey Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law published its Opinion 27 on October 31 of this year.  Opinion 27 states that non-resident attorneys who wish to practice immigration law in the state and who are not members of the New Jersey Bar cannot establish offices in the state. Any out-of-state attorneys can represent clients in New Jersey, but they are not allowed to open offices for conducting their business concerning these representations within the State of New Jersey. The Committee stated that unauthorized representation in immigration matters has become detrimental to the system and has kept qualified immigrants from entering the United States or from staying in them. The opinion of the Committee is that those representing clients without the proper accreditation and authorization should be prohibited from practicing in New Jersey and be subject to sanctions.

 

The Committee has received several complaints about unauthorized and unqualified representatives who have misled, poorly advised, and cheated immigrants, actions which have led to more severe consequences. Applicants and litigants in immigration matters who are badly represented and advised risk loss of benefits, physical liberty, and, in some cases, deportation. U.S. Immigration Judge Dana Marks Keener is quoted in Opinion 27 as stating: “Deportation is often tantamount to exile, with consequences which affect family members as well as the individual himself. In the worst case, inappropriate deportation can lead to incarceration, torture, or death in the hands of a persecutorial government from which the consumer sought refuge.” The Committee expresses the need to address the problem of abuses of non-lawyer practicing exceptions within the immigration law field as urgent, since there is a large potential to client harm.

 

Opinion 27 states that the Committee ought to work with federal authorities in this area in a cooperative undertaking to respond to complaints in a timelier manner. Should the Committee find an unaccredited or unqualified representative among the complaints that they receive, the Committee will notify the Department of Justice, the local immigration court, the Department of Homeland Security Office of Citizenship and Immigration Services, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Or, in appropriate cases, the Committee will cede jurisdiction of the complaint to the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. In addition, the Committee can refer such cases to the Office of the United States Attorney for prosecution or for further investigation.

 

< BackIndex | Next >

 

Print This Page

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.