Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

Department of State Issues Guidelines for Interpreting Intent Provisions of Student Visa Applications

Recently the Department of State issued a document meant to guide consular officers in interpreting the immigrant intent provisions as they process student visa requests. According to the guidelines, while processing an applicant’s request for a student visa, the consular officer should evaluate the applicant’s ability to maintain a residence in the United States for the duration of his or her stay and the officer should focus on the applicant’s immediate to near-term intent. In most visa classifications (B, F, J, M, O-2, P, and Q) the applicant is required to submit proof that s/he possesses a residence abroad that s/he has not intent of abandoning after having obtained a U.S. visa. The purpose of travel should always be the deciding factor in determining the proper visa classification, and because students typically stay in the U.S. for a longer period of time than many other non-immigrant visitors their intent is to be adjudicated based on their present intent. In other words, what they are planning to do after having arrived in the U.S. with a visa and how long they are planning to stay.

 

Normally a non-immigrant visitor’s “ties” are useful in evaluating his or her application; however, a student visitor usually will not have many ties as they are typically young, without employment, without family dependents, and without substantial personal assets. In addition, students may only have general plans for their future. Thus, a student’s residence abroad requirement should be considered in a broader light and should focus solely on the student’s immediate intent.

 

A student’s intended course of study should not be a deciding factor in whether or not the student receives a visa, even if the student plans on studying a subject for which there is little employment opportunity in the student’s home nation. In addition, the type of school (community college, English language schools, 4-year universities, etc.) cannot be taken into account when adjudicating an application. Other factors that are not allowed to be deciding factors include the availability of the same program of study in the student’s home nation and the fact that the training the student would receive in the U.S. would not be of use in the student’s homeland. Consular officials are also instructed to give students ample opportunity and encouragement to return home during their period of study so that they can retain strong ties there. Officials are also instructed to grant returning students the appropriate visas so that students can travel freely back and forth between the U.S. and their home nation. However, when granting a student visa, consular officials must determine the student’s immediate intent to depart the U.S. at the end of his or her program of study.

 

< BackIndex

 

Print This Page

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.