Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

The ABC’s of Immigration: Issues in Losing Citizenship

Many people believe that once they become a citizen of the US, they will always remain so. In fact, this is not always the case, even for people who are US citizens by birth. A few months ago, we covered the ways in which a person can lose their citizenship (http://www.visalaw.com/05jul1/2jul105.html). This week, we will discuss in more detail what can cause a person to lose their citizenship, and how, in some cases, the person can prove the government wrong and regain their status as US citizens.

Why do people lose their citizenship?


There are seven basic ways in which US citizenship can be lost:

 

  • Being naturalized in a foreign country, upon the person’s own application made after reaching 18 years of age;
  • Making an oath or other declaration of allegiance to a foreign country or division thereof, again, after reaching 18 years of age;
  • Serving in the armed forces of a foreign country if those armed forces are engaged in hostilities against the US, or if the person serves as an officer;
  • Working for the government of a foreign country if the person also obtains nationality in that country, or if to work in such a position an oath or other declaration of allegiance is required;
  • Making a formal renunciation of US citizenship before a US consular officer or diplomat in a foreign country;
  • Making a formal written statement of renunciation during a state of war, if the Attorney General approves the renunciation as not contrary to US national defense; and
  • Committing an act of treason against the US, or attempting by force or the use of arms to overthrow the government of the US. Renunciation by this means can be accomplished only after a court has found the person guilty.

 

Each of these acts, however, to be the basis for the loss of US citizenship, must have been performed voluntarily and with the intent for renouncing that citizenship. Until recently, this was not the case, and a renunciating act, regardless of its motive or intent, would lead to the loss of citizenship. In 1986, responding to a series of Supreme Court decisions holding that because US citizenship is grounded in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, Congress cannot determine when a person loses their citizenship, only the person can, Congress amended laws dealing with the renunciation of citizenship to clarify that it can only be accomplished voluntarily and intentionally.

 

How does the Government determine whether or not I intend to renounce citizenship?

Government regulations state that there is a presumption in favor of retaining US citizenship, but in practice, the State Department is likely to find renunciation occurred in almost every situation involving a qualifying act. In some cases, however, the intent to renounce citizenship will be obvious, or it will otherwise be impossible to overcome the presumption that renunciation was the intent. For example, a formal written renunciation of citizenship made during war would be considered conclusive evidence of the intent to renounce US citizenship. Other cases, however, are not so clear.

For example, the US allows dual citizenship. Therefore, in some cases, it is possible to take an oath of allegiance or become naturalized in another country without losing US citizenship. The critical factor is whether the act was intended to renounce US citizenship. There are a number of reasons why a person would be naturalized in another country. For example, doing so can make it easier to obtain employment and other benefits. It can also secure family relationships. It can even, in some cases, where hostility toward the US is high, prevent harm from coming to a person.

In an increasingly international world, more and more people born in the US grow up elsewhere. At some point in their lives, it is not unlikely that they will take an oath of allegiance to the country in which they live, or will seek employment with the government. These things can be done without any intention of renouncing US citizenship. Even though the acts may be performed voluntarily, and even with the intent of obtaining a benefit, this does not mean that there was the intent to renounce citizenship. To ensure that there is the intent to renounce, consular officers are instructed to obtain an affidavit in which the person specifies that they committed the renunciating act with the intent of losing US citizenship. Even with such a document, it is possible to successfully argue that one did not renounce his or her US citizenship, but such cases are very time consuming and require substantial effort.

 

< BackIndex | Next >

 

Print This Page

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.