Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


 
Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


< back

 

Siskind's Legislative Update

The content in Legislative Update comes from Greg Siskind’s immigration blogs. Click on any of the articles’ links for similar stories.

***** 

ARIZONA NOT PROSECUTING EMPLOYER SANCTIONS CASES

My last post discussed one of two parts to the Arizona immigration law - the requirement to use E-Verify. The more controversial part of the law allows the state to revoke business licenses for employers who employ unlawfully present workers. According to a report in the Arizona Republic, after a full year in force, not a single employer has been prosecuted. That part of the law is very possibly unconstitutional and the courts are still in the middle of sorting out the issues. But the federal government is responsible for enforcing immigration law and that's where the focus needs to be rather than at the state or local level. 

*****

NEBRASKA GOVERNOR WON'T ISSUE E-VERIFY EXECUTIVE ORDER  

Nebraska Governor Dave Heinemann refuses to follow governors in Rhode Island and Minnesota in requiring state contractors and state agencies to use E-Verify.  

*****

US CHAMBER SUES OVER FEDERAL CONTRACTOR E-VERIFY RULE  

The gist is that the 1996 immigration act which created E-Verify said that the program was voluntary. Also, requiring the re-verification of existing employees exceeds the statute's mandate. The suit alleges as well that the regulation exceeds the parameters of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949. 

***** 

NEW YORK COUNTY PROPOSING EMPLOYER SANCTIONS RULE 

Putnam County, New York is considering a law that would permit the revocation of business licenses for certain types of small businesses. My favorite quote from the story is actually in the reader comments: 

I can think of one person who benefits from illegal immigrants: The Consumer, whose cost of numerous indispensible services decreases s a result of low paid illegal immigrants. If people dont like illegal immigrants performing labor intensive work, maybe they should do it themselves. Until everyone cuts their own lawn, flips their own burger, cleans their own house and builds their own additions they should shut their ignorant white-trash mouths. 

***** 

JUDGE TO DECIDE IF OREGON COUNTY'S EMPLOYER SANCTIONS LAW OKAY  

A judge will determine if Columbia County's law fining employers up to $10,000 for unlawfully employing illegally present workers is legal. 

***** 

RHODE ISLAND EXECUTIVE ORDER STILL DRAWING FIRE  

The Rhode Island Department of Administration has been having hearings about implementing Governor Carcieri's mandate that all state agencies and all private companies doing business with the state use E-Verify. The ACLU is still fighting the order in court and wants protections for US workers.

 

 

< Back | Index | Next >

 

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2008 Siskind Susser. All rights reserved.