Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration


MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


1.     Openers

 

Dear Readers:

 

This week the infamous Arizona immigration law is scheduled to take effect and no one has any idea whether it will actually happen or not. A judge heard arguments last week in the first of seven lawsuits challenging the law. She indicated that she would only consider stopping sections of the law that were not in dispute so that means at least part of the law will go in to force. But even if the judge believes the plaintiffs have a point, it is not clear that she will stop the law before it takes effect as opposed to letting it take force and ruling later on the merits.

 

Also, the White House could stop one of the more controversial sections of the law if it chooses. DHS could simply not cooperate with Arizona law enforcement officials which would mean there would be no way to verify the legal status of individuals. The Justice Department has, of course, sued to stop the law from taking effect so it would make sense if DHS took such action. But we’ll have to wait and see.

 

In the mean time, many are asking if comprehensive immigration reform is dead for 2010 (and beyond). Senator Harry Reid has made comments in recent days that strongly hint that this is the case and is suggesting pro-immigration advocates look at trying to get something less this year – perhaps the DREAM Act.

 

Many, including me, have been suggesting this approach for a while. The Democrats had the ability to kill the filibuster some time back and have instead left the 60 vote requirement in place. And that has meant difficult bills have not been brought up for a vote – including immigration. Since it looks like the “nuclear” strategy of killing the filibuster is not going to happen, the odds of comprehensive immigration reform passing have dropped. Republicans are clearly not going to risk the wrath of Tea Party constituents for anything too big. But some bills – like DREAM – probably have the votes to pass.

 

As they say in politics, the perfect is the enemy of the good. So while CIR is really the ideal way to address the problems in our immigration system, being wedded to that solution versus accepting something less actually is doing more to hurt immigrants than help. It has been ten years since Congress passed anything that really helped a lot of immigrants. And for the last six of those years, pro-immigrant groups have been the ones blocking positive legislation for fear that if anything popular is brought up, it will reduce support for a comprehensive bill. That’s a good strategy for the short run. But after years and years of trying, the all or nothing approach has really proven to be the source of a lot of pain.

 

Readers are reminded that they are welcome to contact my law office if they would like to schedule a telephone or in person consultation with me or one of my colleagues. If you are interested, please call my office at 901-682-6455.

 

Regards,

 

 

Greg Siskind

 Index | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2008 Siskind Susser. All rights reserved.