Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration


MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


< back

 

3. Ask Visalaw.com

 

In our Ask Visalaw.com section of the SIB, attorney Ari Sauer answers immigration law questions sent in by our readers. If you enjoy reading this section, we encourage you to visit Ari’s blog, The Immigration Answer Man, where he provides more answers to your immigration questions. You can also follow The Immigration Answer Man on Facebook and Twitter.

 

If you have a question on immigration matters, write Ask-visalaw@visalaw.com. We can't answer every question, but if you ask a short question that can be answered concisely, we'll consider it for publication. Remember, these questions are only intended to provide general information. You should consult with your own attorney before acting on information you see here.

* * *  

 

1) Question:

 

I am in the U.S. on an H-1B and my wife is on an H-4. My company will start my residence process, probably using the EB2 category.

 

But, in 2006 my wife’s sister filed an I-130 immigrant petition for a relative. I am not sure I am included in that request. I just see my wife's name in the Beneficiary section on the I-797.

 

My question is if this parallel process might affect my EB2 process, whether my wife’s sister has including me or not?

 

Answer:

 

The two processes are parallel to each other and will not have any effect on the other. According to the Visa Bulletin, visa availability for the EB-2 preference category is current except for nationals from China and India, which are currently available for May 2006 priority dates. Visa availability for sibling petitions (F-4) are currently in 2001 for nationals of most countries.

 

You cannot transfer the priority date from your wife’s family-based petition to your employment-based petition.

 

Your name may have been included on the Form I-130 application, if you were married to your wife at the time. However the primary beneficiary is your wife, and your name would not be listed on the I-797 notice. You are still eligible to benefit from the petition as your wife’s derivative beneficiary, even if your name was mistakenly left off the application, as long as you remain married to your wife.

 

2) Question:

I have an employee who is currently in his first year of an H1-B visa. He would like to do some part-time work consulting for a university, in the same field as his work here. Could he do that without filing any further paperwork?

Someone here in our HR has suggested that he would have to file for
another H1-B visa to work at the other company. Another person said that since his work would be in the same field as his work here, it would be legal without further paperwork.

The reason for the work is that it would allow him to finish a Ph.D. which he started at the university.

Answer:

The H-1B only allows the beneficiary to work for the H-1B petitioner. Any unauthorized work for other employers is a violation of the status and would result in the person falling out of status.

However, there is no problem with having more than one H-1Bs at the same time as long as the person is maintaining the requirements for both H-1Bs.

The other university has to file an H-1B petition for him.

 

3) Question:

I was imprisoned in my home country for protesting against the dictorial regime. When I applied for asylum, I answered 'yes' on the question asking if I had ever been arrested.

But when I applied for my green card I answered 'no' to the question of whether I had ever been arrested for breaking or violating a law because the arrest itself was illegal.

Now I am applying for U.S. citizenship. Do I have to answer 'yes' to the question of whether I have been arrested? Will it be a problem that my answers on my asylum application and green card application were different?

Answer:

With the naturalization application, it is always best to err on the side of being too honest, as the easiest way for a USCIS officer to deny an application is to show that the applicant was not truthful in the application. A denial on this basis will mean that the applicant will have to wait another 5 years (3 years if you are applying as the spouse of a U.S. citizen) before being able to file again.

If you have ever been arrested, detained, ticketed, or given a citation for any reason you should check yes in answer to the question on the N-400. This is true even if it was an unlawful arrest or detention, if it happened in a different country, if the charges were dismissed, if no charges were ever brought, or if the arrest records were expunged. You can include an explanation of the arrest on the application and you will be given a chance to explain the arrest at the interview.

In this situation you should also answer yes to the question about whether you ever gave false or misleading information when applying for an immigration benefit. This is because you did not mention the arrest on the green card application. As I said, it is best to err on the side of being overly honest on the naturalization application. Again you can include an explanation in the application and will be able to explain at the interview.

< Back | Index | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2008 Siskind Susser. All rights reserved.