Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration


MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


6. News Bytes:

 

Utah lawmaker rolls out bill on illegal immigration

 

The Salt Lake Tribune reports that Utah State Representative Stephen Sandstrom revealed a 12-page bill that would require officers to check the immigration status of anyone detained for a crime or traffic violation if there is ‘reasonable suspicion’ that they are in the country illegally.  He expects the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver to look more favorably upon the law than the 9th Circuit Court in San Francisco which which will oversee Arizona’s federal court appeal.

 

Opponents of the law have said that the measure will do nothing but inflame ‘hatred and fear among Utahans’ and create a hostile environment comparable to Arizona.  Tony Yapias of Proyecto Latino de Utah and other protestors have unsucessfuly appealed to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to take a stance against the law because it runs counter to the teachings of the faith.  The church, however, has not weighed in on the issue and instead says it is up to political leaders to decide immigration policy.

 

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home/50101378-76/sandstrom-immigration-bill-state.html.csp

* * * * * *  

 

India threatens WTO dispute over visa regulations

 

The Washington Times reports that President Obama has signed a bill that raises H-1B and L-1 visa fees on companies that hire a majority of foreign workers and $10 billion in additional taxes on multinational companies with headquarters in the U.S.  $600 million from the increase in visa fees will be used to put more agents and equipment along the Mexican border and the multinational tax will finance an extension of last year’s stimulus bill.

 

Agence France Presse reports that India has threatened to take the United States to the World Trade Organization (WTO) over its measure to hike visa fees.  India has called the U.S. policy ‘protectionist’ and fears higher fees will harm the country’s larger outsourcing sector.  The National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM), which represents India’s top software companies, estimates annual U.S. visa costs to rise by at least $200-250 million annually.   India’s trade minister, Shri Anand Sharma, sent a letter to the White House protesting the ‘highly discriminatory law’ as contrary to the rules of the WTO and the General Agreement in Trade in Services (GATS). 

 

R. Bruce Josten, vice president of government affairs for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce agreed that the legislation could risk adverse impacts on U.S.-based companies and retaliation by affected governments in the WTO or against U.S. companies operating in foreign markets.  Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), who sponsored the legislation, argued that imposing taxes and fees on foreign workers and companies was the best way to raise money and address unemployment and immigration issues.

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/12/border-security-measure-sent-to-obama/

 

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5g_ywJRMrVzfYU3fOHA9Y9Lmxu2jg

* * * * * *

 

U.S. may sue Arizona’s Sheriff Arpaio for not cooperating in investigation

 

The Washington Post reports that the Department of Justice has threatened to sue Arizona’s Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio if he refuses to cooperate with its civil rights investigation into possible discriminatory practices..  Arpaio also faces an investigation by a federal grand jury in Phoenix into whether he has used his position to intimidate political opponents and whether he his office has misappropriated government funds.  The civil rights investigation began in March 2009 and the grand jury investigation has been underway since January 2010.

 

Arpaio faces criticism for his highly publicized ‘crime sweeps’ conducted in mostly Hispanic neighborhoods.  He is also accused of performing ‘unconstitutional searches and seizures,’ forcing Hispanic inmates to fill out a ‘citizenship check’ form, and requiring his bilingual jail guards to speak to inmates only in English.

 

The sheriff’s office has denied requests to turn over documents or meet with investigators and contends that the investigations are politically motivated, citing statements by Attorney General Eric Holder that the inquiries are expected to ‘produce results.’

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2010/08/17/AR2010081703637.html?hpid=moreheadlines

* * * * * *

 

California city to require e-verify use

 

The Press-Enterprise reports that city council of Murrieta, California unanimously approved an ordinance mandating all city business to use E-Verify, a federal program that determines a potential employee’s work status.  The city council initially considered a resolution that urged employers to use E-Verify but did not require its use.  Although a similar mandate in Arizona was challenged in court, Murrieta city attorneys recommended passing the resolution while waiting for a final court ruling.

 

The Inland Empire Rapid Response Network, a California immigrants’ rights group, criticized the mandate in a statement claiming that conservative groups pushing for E-Verify laws are directing their anger towards local immigrant families when they should actually be pressuring federal officials who are not enforcing immigration law.

 

http://www.pe.com/localnews/stories/PE_News_Local_D_sverify18.64cadffd.html

* * * * * *  

 

Cherokee Nation opposes Arizona SB 1070

 

The Tahlequah Daily Press (Tahlequah, OK) reports that the Cherokee Nation Tribal Council formally announced its opposition to Arizona Senate Bill 1070.  Tribal Councilor Julia Coates believes that many Native Americans living outside of reservations in Arizona who do not speak English and are without birth certificates will be targeted by law enforcement as illegally present immigrants.  The Tribal Council also wanted to voice its opinion against the law because some members of the Oklahoma legislature are currently advocating for a similar resolution in their state. 

 

http://tahlequahdailypress.com/local/x743764163/Tribal-council-unites-against-immigration-law-in-Arizona

* * * * * *

 

Feds to restrict financial aid to elderly immigrants

 

The Los Angeles Times reports that 3,800 recipients of Supplemental Security Income may lose their eligibility on September 30th unless they have a pending naturalization application.  The federal program provides monthly checks to low-income elderly, blind, and disabled people, including asylees and humanitarian immigrants admitted to the U.S. because they are victims of war, persecution, sex trafficking, and other disasters in their home countries. 

 

Refugee advocates have pointed out that some of these legal immigrants have trouble passing a citizenship exam or have not received their green cards because of delays in the application process.  These advocates have urged Congress to pass another year’s extension until a permanent solution to the problem is found. 

 

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/22/local/la-me-refugee-assistance-20100823

* * * * * *

< Back | Index | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2008 Siskind Susser. All rights reserved.