Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration


MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


< back

 

 

5. News from the Courts:

Federal Court Dismisses Arizona Countersuit Over Illegal Immigration

 

HSToday reports that Judge Susan Bolton, of the U.S. District Court for Arizona, dismissed a countersuit by the state of Arizona against the U.S. federal government over the state’s controversial illegal immigration law, SB 1070.  Judge Bolton ruled that the court could not give a ruling on Arizona’s claims that the federal government had not secured the U.S. Southwest border, thereby leaving Arizona vulnerable to harm through illegal immigration.  Governor Jan Brewer expressed disappointment at the dismissal and insisted the federal government still failed to secure U.S. borders.  For now, the state’s only recourse is to wait and see if the Supreme Court will hear their case and overturn the injunction imposed by lower courts on SB 1070. 

 

http://www.hstoday.us/index.php?id=95&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=19756&cHash=2faa0b9013d8a38d3c8e9be375541c00

 

*****

Justice Dept. Sues over SC’s New Immigration Law

 

Bloomberg News reports that the Justice Department sought an injunction from a federal judge as part of its lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of South Carolina’s tough new immigration law.  U.S. Attorney Bill Nettles said the law is unconstitutional and violates people’s right to due process.  South Carolina’s law takes effect Jan. 1 and is among the toughest in the nation. 

 

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-11-09/u-s-asks-judge-to-issue-order-on-south-carolina-immigration-law.html

 

Fox News Latino reports that sixteen nations from Latin America and the Caribbean have asked to join in the U.S. Justice department’s lawsuit against South Carolina’s controversial law that aims to curb the number of illegally present immigrants in the state.  The 16 nations state in their filings that the law would lead to state-sanctioned discrimination against their citizens.

 

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2011/11/09/sc-immigration-law-challenged-by-16-latam-and-carib-nations/

 

*****

Appeals Court to Hear GA Immigration Law Arguments Next Year

 

The Atlanta Journal Constitution reports that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta has scheduled oral arguments involving Georgia and Alabama’s stringent new immigration laws for some time between Feb. 28 and March 2, 2012.  Key parts of both laws will likely remain on hold for several more months as a result.  Georgia is appealing a lower court’s ruling to put Georgia’s law on hold amid a court challenge brought by a coalition of civil and immigrant rights groups.  Last month, the appeals court approved the U.S. Justice Department's request to temporarily put parts of Alabama’s law on hold pending the outcome of an appeal.  The court, however, refused to halt a provision that would require police in Alabama to do immigration status checks under certain circumstances. Proponents of Georgia's law said the court's ruling in Alabama’s case boosts their efforts to empower police to do immigration status checks.

 

http://www.ajc.com/news/appeals-court-to-hear-1216845.html

 

*****

Infosys’ H-1B Visa Misuse: U.S. Court Denies Arbitration in Palmer Case

 

First Post reports that a U.S. court has denied arbitration in the visa case filed by employee Jack Palmer against the software company Infosys.  Palmer had earlier alleged that Infosys was misusing H-1B visa norms by sending low-level and unskilled employees to the U.S. on B-1 visas instead, which are typically used for short-term travel.  Additionally, Palmer accused Infosys of securing H-1B visas for employers who lack requisite specialized talent.  The court ruled that there has to be clear and unmistakable intent from both sides to go through arbitration and that in this case there has been no clear intent.  Palmer had initially filed a whistleblower complaint and thereafter a case in a civil court in the U.S.

 

http://www.firstpost.com/business/infosys-h-1b-visa-misuse-us-court-denies-arbitration-in-palmer-case-128511.html

 

*****

Govt. Asks Supreme Court to Stay Out of Arizona Immigration Case

 

The Associated Press reports that the Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to stay out of a lawsuit involving Arizona’s immigration law, saying lower courts properly blocked tough provisions targeting illegally present immigrants.  Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer is seeking to overturn the judge’s decision and wants a Supreme Court review of the case, arguing that the issues are of compelling, nationwide importance.  The Justice Department disagreed saying, “That several states have recently adopted new laws in this important area is not a sufficient reason for this court to grant review” of the first appeals court decision.

 

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g6B5KiBY7sduDJ7vaRBoJi7aBgFQ?docId=17442ba2fbe74adea0bb61fbbe3db50a

 

*****

< Back | Index | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2008 Siskind Susser. All rights reserved.