Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration


MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


1. Openers
Dear Readers:

It took three debates, but last Tuesday immigration finally came up in the presidential debates. President Obama touted his DREAM initiative, argued that he has made the legal immigration system much more streamlined and has slowed illegal immigration at the borders. Governor Romney argued that he would favor some kind of DREAM Act proposal, argued that he would be able to pass an immigration reform measure (without "amnesty") and would "staple a green card" to the diplomas of advanced degree science, technology, engineering and math graduates of US institutions.

The two also attacked each other. Romney argued that President Obama failed to keep his promise to pursue immigration reform in his first year in office. President Obama accused Governor Romney of endorsing the Arizona immigration law, opposing the DREAM Act and favoring a policy of "self-deportation."

The President defended himself saying that Romney and the Republican Congress have shown no interest in negotiating on reform. Romney responded to the President's criticism claiming he only endorsed the E-Verify sections of the Arizona law. President Obama reminded Romney that the author of the Arizona law, Kris Kobach, is a senior Romney advisor on immigration policy.

To date, President Obama's message has been more appealing to Hispanic voters, the one voting bloc that polling indicates actually cares about the immigration issue. The President has been leading Romney by 50 points with this group, far more than the 12 point margin John Kerry had in 2004.

*****

The US Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued a major decision this week ruling the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional. DOMA bars federal agencies from providing any benefits to individuals in same sex marriages and unions. And that means US citizens are unable to sponsor their same-sex spouses for immigration benefits even if the marriage takes place in one of the growing number of states that allows such marriages or in a country where same sex marriages are legal. The US Supreme Court is likely going to be rule on DOMA soon.

The President has said he believes DOMA is unconstitutional and will not defend DOMA in court, but will continue to instruct the federal government to apply DOMA until the law is completely overturn by the courts or Congress repeals it. However, the Administration did just announce that same sex marriages and unions will now be a factor in determining when deportation proceedings will be initiated.

*****

In firm news, Elissa Taub and I recorded a webinar on physician immigration geared to physicians (as opposed to recruiters or employers) and we have placed the program on Youtube at http://youtu.be/NVbwGYQ7cjw. We plan on posting more programs online in the coming months and I'll provide the links here.

*****

Readers are reminded that they are welcome to contact my law office if they would like to schedule a telephone or in person consultation with me or one of my colleagues. If you are interested, please call my office at 901-682-6455.

Regards,

Greg Siskind

Index | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2008 Siskind Susser. All rights reserved.