Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration


MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


5. News from the Courts:

U.S. Agrees to New Rules for Immigration Raids

The New York Times reports that federal authorities have agreed to establish new policies regarding the conduct of immigration officers during raids, including restrictions on how and when agents can enter private homes. The rules are included in a settlement that was approved by a Federal District Court judge concluding a six-year-old class-action lawsuit. The suit contended that in eight raids in 2006 and 2007, without court warrants or other legal justification, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents forced their way into the homes of Latino families on Long Island and in Westchester County. The settlement also ordered the federal government to pay $1 million in damages and fees $36,000 to each plaintiff and the rest to cover lawyers' fees. Brian Hale, a spokesman for ICE, said the agency had no comment on the settlement.

The raids were among hundreds conducted in the New York metro region and across the country as part of national enforcement operations intended to catch and deport dangerous criminals, and immigrants previously ordered to leave the country. The raids were widely criticized, even by local officials. It caused many lawsuits, most of which have been resolved, though the latest settlement appeared to be the only one that has required federal policy changes. Immigration agents needing consent to enter a private resident will now have to seek permission in a language spoken by the resident. Agents must also get consent from residents to enter the yards and other private outside areas adjoining their homes.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/05/nyregion/us-agrees-to-set-new-rules-for-immigration-raids.html?_r=0

*****

USCIS Resumes Decisions of H-2B Petitions

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has resumed processing all H-2B petitions for non-agricultural workers. On March 22, 2013, USCIS temporarily suspended decisions on H-2B petitions while the government decided on an appropriate action in response to a March 21, 2013 court order (Comite de Apoyo a los Trabajadores Agricolas et al v. Solis). The court order granted a permanent injunction against operating under the Department of Labor's (DOL) 2008 wage rule as it relates the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) wage determinations. The court order gave the DOL 30 days to come into compliance with the order.

On April 24, 2013, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Labor jointly published an Interim Final Rule (IFR), Wage Methodology for the Temporary Non-Agricultural Employment H-2B Program, Part 2, in the Federal Register. The IFR revises wage determinations used by the DOL to pay H-2B workers. Employers are required to pay the new wages for any work performed on and after the date the employer receives the new prevailing wage information from DOL.

http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=44196

*****

< Back | Index | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2008 Siskind Susser. All rights reserved.