Sunday, April 09, 2006
MASSIVE PRO-IMMIGRANT PROTESTS HELD AROUND COUNTRY

Hundreds of thousands of people protested to support comprehensive immigration reform in all parts of the country today. And this is a preview of tomorrow's major protests when millions are expected to turn out.
In Dallas, as many as 500,000 people took to the streets to show their support.
But while Texas had the largest rally of the day, large crowds showed up in many other cities. 180,000 turned out in Washington, D.C. 30,000 turned out in Minnesota, Iowa. 50,000 marched in San Diego. And similar scenes played out in New Mexico, Minnesota, Michigan, Iowa, Alabama, Utah, Oregon, Idaho and Mississippi.
Rallies are set in 136 cities around the country tomorrow and more than 2 million people are expected to participate. And the rallies will start to include representative of other immigrant groups.
In San Francisco, the ZChinese community wil parade out of Chinatown. Haitians will turn out in Miami. And Africans will turn out in anothe r protest in Washington.
Want to show your support and attend one of the April 10th rallies? Go to http://www.cccaction.org/cccaction/april_10_local_events.html
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 10:42 PM
WHO BLEW IT?
If you listened to President Bush in today's radio address and Senator Frist during yesterday's floor statements, Harry Reid and Democratic allies never really wanted to get a bill passed and used the amendment dispute as a way to keep the bill from getting to a vote. Why? Because they didn't want to give the Republicans a victory on this issue and are hoping to make immigration an issue in the November election.
Listen to Reid and the fault all lies with the Republicans who are intent on figuring out a way to gut the Hegel-Martinez compromise either via amendments or in the conference committee. The Democrats are just trying to keep the Republicans honest.
Whose right? Well, there certainly is plenty of fingerpointing. Marc Cooper, the pro-immigration liberal columnist for the Nation actually has some not so kind words for Senator Reid:
What we didn't anticipate it is what appears to be the ignominious role played by Democratic Minority Leader Harry Reid. I had written, as recently as Thursday, that it looked like his GOP counter-part, Bill Frist, was actually the guy who was going to scuttle what has been the five-year long effort to enact comprehensive reform. But then, the whole story took yet another unexpected turn. An authentic bi-partisan majority was reached in support of an imperfect but significant compromise: a bill that would liberalize and expand legalized immigration as well as grant legal status to six or seven million "illegals" already living here.
And then, on Friday, defeat snatched from victory. The whole deal collapses. And while the reasons are myriad, and while the back-room bickering may never be fully disclosed, there's a whole lot of anecdotal evidence that Harry Reid intentionally blocked the deal. There is an argument to be made that he did the right thing i.e. to "protect" the core of the bill. There's a much stronger argument that Reid simply didn't want to hand a legislative victory to an unpopular Majority Leader and his equally unpopular President. And to hell with the 7 million immigrants who might have benefitted.
This is not some right-wing conspiracy theory. You can find it in Friday's daily press briefing (not yet online) from the non-partisan but certainly Democrat-friendly and liberal leaning National Immigration Forum.
According to a behind-the-scenes story in Time Magazine, the Democrats are hardly united behind Reid. Senator Kennedy, according to Time, is furious at the maneuver. On the other hand, Time indicates that Reid's fears regarding what would happen in the conference committee are not trivial. If the bill gets gutted in the conference committee and then comes back to the Senate for a vote, it might be "political suicide" for the Democrats to vote against it.
And there is some reason to believe this is true. Look what happened in the House in December. A number of Democrats in vulnerable, right-leaning seats. My own Congressman is the perfect example. He's not anti-immigrant. But he's a Democrat now running for Senate in Tennessee, one of the so-called "red states." He would vote for a guest worker program if it were part of an immigration bill. But there's no way he would vote against a border enforcement bill in the middle of a campaign.
Personally, I think the amendments argument is not that strong. The Republicans seem willing to limit the number of amendments to a reasonable number like twenty so the "filibuster by amendment" argument is one that I don't buy. The Democrats also have the votes to stop the worst of the amendments or at least alter them so they don't destroy the substance of the deal. But I do think the conference committee fears are a real issue. So getting some assurance that the Senators on the conference will walk away from the table if the bill is being destroyed is key. I'll leave it to the politicians to figure out how to get such a guarantee.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 12:08 AM
XML newsfeed
archives
20030930
20031001
20031002
20031007
20031009
20031015
20031017
20031030
20031031
20031114
20031120
20040107
20040210
20040211
20040212
20040216
20040217
20040218
20040219
20040220
20040223
20040224
20040226
20040227
20040302
20040303
20040305
20040309
20040310
20040315
20040316
20040317
20040318
20040325
20040328
20040329
20040331
20040401
20040408
20040412
20040413
20040416
20040421
20040422
20040423
20040426
20040504
20040507
20040511
20040513
20040517
20040518
20040519
20040520
20040524
20040525
20040602
20040603
20040607
20040608
20040610
20040614
20040617
20040618
20040621
20040622
20040623
20040624
20040628
20040629
20040630
20040706
20040707
20040708
20040709
20040712
20040713
20040714
20040715
20040719
20040721
20040726
20040727
20040728
20040802
20040803
20040804
20040809
20040812
20040817
20040818
20040819
20040823
20040824
20040825
20040830
20040831
20040901
20040907
20040909
20040913
20040920
20040921
20041005
20041013
20041015
20041018
20041019
20041021
20041022
20041025
20041101
20041103
20041104
20041109
20041110
20041112
20041115
20041116
20041117
20041119
20041123
20041129
20041130
20041201
20041203
20041206
20041209
20041215
20041216
20041222
20050119
20050125
20050202
20050204
20050210
20050216
20050217
20050224
20050401
20050407
20050412
20050503
20050504
20050506
20050511
20050513
20050516
20050523
20050524
20050603
20050606
20050616
20050627
20050630
20050808
20050811
20050812
20050817
20050912
20050914
20050920
20050923
20050925
20051003
20051011
20051014
20051017
20051024
20051025
20051028
20051101
20051107
20051115
20051116
20051117
20051118
20051128
20051130
20051202
20051206
20051207
20051212
20051219
20051220
20060118
20060121
20060125
20060126
20060127
20060202
20060207
20060208
20060216
20060217
20060221
20060222
20060227
20060228
20060301
20060302
20060303
20060306
20060308
20060313
20060315
20060316
20060317
20060320
20060323
20060324
20060329
20060330
20060331
20060401
20060402
20060403
20060404
20060405
20060406
20060407
20060409
20060410
20060411
20060412
20060413
20060414
20060415
20060416
20060417
20060418
20060420
20060421
20060422
20060423
20060426
20060427

Hundreds of thousands of people protested to support comprehensive immigration reform in all parts of the country today. And this is a preview of tomorrow's major protests when millions are expected to turn out.
In Dallas, as many as 500,000 people took to the streets to show their support.
But while Texas had the largest rally of the day, large crowds showed up in many other cities. 180,000 turned out in Washington, D.C. 30,000 turned out in Minnesota, Iowa. 50,000 marched in San Diego. And similar scenes played out in New Mexico, Minnesota, Michigan, Iowa, Alabama, Utah, Oregon, Idaho and Mississippi.
Rallies are set in 136 cities around the country tomorrow and more than 2 million people are expected to participate. And the rallies will start to include representative of other immigrant groups.
In San Francisco, the ZChinese community wil parade out of Chinatown. Haitians will turn out in Miami. And Africans will turn out in anothe r protest in Washington.
Want to show your support and attend one of the April 10th rallies? Go to http://www.cccaction.org/cccaction/april_10_local_events.html
Listen to Reid and the fault all lies with the Republicans who are intent on figuring out a way to gut the Hegel-Martinez compromise either via amendments or in the conference committee. The Democrats are just trying to keep the Republicans honest.
Whose right? Well, there certainly is plenty of fingerpointing. Marc Cooper, the pro-immigration liberal columnist for the Nation actually has some not so kind words for Senator Reid:
What we didn't anticipate it is what appears to be the ignominious role played by Democratic Minority Leader Harry Reid. I had written, as recently as Thursday, that it looked like his GOP counter-part, Bill Frist, was actually the guy who was going to scuttle what has been the five-year long effort to enact comprehensive reform. But then, the whole story took yet another unexpected turn. An authentic bi-partisan majority was reached in support of an imperfect but significant compromise: a bill that would liberalize and expand legalized immigration as well as grant legal status to six or seven million "illegals" already living here.
And then, on Friday, defeat snatched from victory. The whole deal collapses. And while the reasons are myriad, and while the back-room bickering may never be fully disclosed, there's a whole lot of anecdotal evidence that Harry Reid intentionally blocked the deal. There is an argument to be made that he did the right thing i.e. to "protect" the core of the bill. There's a much stronger argument that Reid simply didn't want to hand a legislative victory to an unpopular Majority Leader and his equally unpopular President. And to hell with the 7 million immigrants who might have benefitted.
This is not some right-wing conspiracy theory. You can find it in Friday's daily press briefing (not yet online) from the non-partisan but certainly Democrat-friendly and liberal leaning National Immigration Forum.
According to a behind-the-scenes story in Time Magazine, the Democrats are hardly united behind Reid. Senator Kennedy, according to Time, is furious at the maneuver. On the other hand, Time indicates that Reid's fears regarding what would happen in the conference committee are not trivial. If the bill gets gutted in the conference committee and then comes back to the Senate for a vote, it might be "political suicide" for the Democrats to vote against it.
And there is some reason to believe this is true. Look what happened in the House in December. A number of Democrats in vulnerable, right-leaning seats. My own Congressman is the perfect example. He's not anti-immigrant. But he's a Democrat now running for Senate in Tennessee, one of the so-called "red states." He would vote for a guest worker program if it were part of an immigration bill. But there's no way he would vote against a border enforcement bill in the middle of a campaign.
Personally, I think the amendments argument is not that strong. The Republicans seem willing to limit the number of amendments to a reasonable number like twenty so the "filibuster by amendment" argument is one that I don't buy. The Democrats also have the votes to stop the worst of the amendments or at least alter them so they don't destroy the substance of the deal. But I do think the conference committee fears are a real issue. So getting some assurance that the Senators on the conference will walk away from the table if the bill is being destroyed is key. I'll leave it to the politicians to figure out how to get such a guarantee.
XML newsfeed
archives
20031001
20031002
20031007
20031009
20031015
20031017
20031030
20031031
20031114
20031120
20040107
20040210
20040211
20040212
20040216
20040217
20040218
20040219
20040220
20040223
20040224
20040226
20040227
20040302
20040303
20040305
20040309
20040310
20040315
20040316
20040317
20040318
20040325
20040328
20040329
20040331
20040401
20040408
20040412
20040413
20040416
20040421
20040422
20040423
20040426
20040504
20040507
20040511
20040513
20040517
20040518
20040519
20040520
20040524
20040525
20040602
20040603
20040607
20040608
20040610
20040614
20040617
20040618
20040621
20040622
20040623
20040624
20040628
20040629
20040630
20040706
20040707
20040708
20040709
20040712
20040713
20040714
20040715
20040719
20040721
20040726
20040727
20040728
20040802
20040803
20040804
20040809
20040812
20040817
20040818
20040819
20040823
20040824
20040825
20040830
20040831
20040901
20040907
20040909
20040913
20040920
20040921
20041005
20041013
20041015
20041018
20041019
20041021
20041022
20041025
20041101
20041103
20041104
20041109
20041110
20041112
20041115
20041116
20041117
20041119
20041123
20041129
20041130
20041201
20041203
20041206
20041209
20041215
20041216
20041222
20050119
20050125
20050202
20050204
20050210
20050216
20050217
20050224
20050401
20050407
20050412
20050503
20050504
20050506
20050511
20050513
20050516
20050523
20050524
20050603
20050606
20050616
20050627
20050630
20050808
20050811
20050812
20050817
20050912
20050914
20050920
20050923
20050925
20051003
20051011
20051014
20051017
20051024
20051025
20051028
20051101
20051107
20051115
20051116
20051117
20051118
20051128
20051130
20051202
20051206
20051207
20051212
20051219
20051220
20060118
20060121
20060125
20060126
20060127
20060202
20060207
20060208
20060216
20060217
20060221
20060222
20060227
20060228
20060301
20060302
20060303
20060306
20060308
20060313
20060315
20060316
20060317
20060320
20060323
20060324
20060329
20060330
20060331
20060401
20060402
20060403
20060404
20060405
20060406
20060407
20060409
20060410
20060411
20060412
20060413
20060414
20060415
20060416
20060417
20060418
20060420
20060421
20060422
20060423
20060426
20060427

