Thursday, April 13, 2006
DEMOCRATS SEEK TO RESUME WORK ON IMMIGRATION BILL SOON
According to a report in the Associated Press, Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), the Democratic leader, sent a letter to Senator Bill Frist (R-TN), the Republican leader asking for the Senate to resume work on the immigration bill immediately after the Senate finished a spending bill dealing with funding the war in Iraq and relief for victims of Hurricane Katrina.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 7:09 PM
NEW COMPROMISE BILL INTRODUCED IN SENATE
I have just received the newest compromise bill which reflects the Hegel-Martinez compromise language as well as a number of additional changes reflecting amendments pending at the time of the recess last week. There are a number of additional new sections making the bill come in at a whopping 614 pages.
We will be analyzing the text over the next days and will update our section by section summary to inform readers of the substance of the changes.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 6:54 PM
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC: WILL A BORDER FENCE BE AN ENVIRONMENTAL NIGHTMARE?
National Geographic, not normally known for weighing in on political questions, has an article warning that a border fence could be harmful to wildlife in the region.
As the U.S. government debates major immigration reform, environmentalists warn that the proposed laws would also prevent animal migrants from crossing the country's southern border.
Specifically, the legislation's proposal to erect 700 miles (1,125 kilometers) of immigrant-stopping fence could block key wildlife migration routes in the Sonoran Desert along the U.S.-Mexico border.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 7:05 AM
READ GREG SISKIND'S COLUMN IN THIS MORNING'S MEMPHIS COMMERCIAL APPEAL
I've written an opinion article in this morning's Memphis Commercial Appeal newspaper about myths surrounding comprehensive immigration reform.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 6:44 AM
ABC NEWS POLL SHOWS PUBLIC OVERWHELMINGLY BACKS SENATE IMMIGRATION APPROACH OVER HOUSE VERSION
A new poll from ABC News and the Washington Post asked a number of immigration questions and findings were surprising
President Bush received poor marks for his handling of immigration with 33% approving and 61% disapproving.
The general public still ranks immigation low on the list of most important issues. Only 12% of members of the public consider immigration the most important issue and presumably views are split in that small number. This is consistent with other polls and this finding, compared with polls of Hispanic voters showing they overwhelmingly consider immigration the most important issue is giving Republicans some worries. They don't appear to be winning ovters with the anti-immigrant views, but there are clearly alienating the very important Hispanic voting community.
The public is now giving Democrats much higher marks on immigration issues than Republicans. 50% of the public approves the Democrats handling of the issue while Republicans only get 38% appvoal ratings.
75% of the public believes that we're not doing enough to thwart illegal immigration. But most, nearly 2/3, don't think that immigrants pose a threat to American workers.
The most interesting question, in my opinion was the following one which asked people to make choices regarding the major options being considered by Congress. Interesting, the House approach and the Frist approach are overwhelmingly unpopural.
21. I'll read three proposals for illegal immigrants who currently live and work in the United States. Please tell me which you prefer.
ONE: Let immigrants who have lived here a certain number
of years apply for legal status and eventually become
permanent citizens if they meet specific conditions,
like paying a fine and back taxes
TWO: Let them pay a fee and work here for a limited number
of years after which they'd have to leave the country
THREE: Declare all illegal immigrants to be felons and not
allow them to work here legally
Which of these would you prefer -
a program that may lead to legal status and permanent
citizenship,a program allowing them to work here for a
limited number of years but not remain permanently, or
no temporary work program and felony status?
Program that may lead to legal status and permanent citizenship 63
Program allowing them to work here but not remain permanently 14
No temporary work program and felony status 20
None of them (vol.) 2
No opinion 1
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 12:26 AM
XML newsfeed
archives
20030930
20031001
20031002
20031007
20031009
20031015
20031017
20031030
20031031
20031114
20031120
20040107
20040210
20040211
20040212
20040216
20040217
20040218
20040219
20040220
20040223
20040224
20040226
20040227
20040302
20040303
20040305
20040309
20040310
20040315
20040316
20040317
20040318
20040325
20040328
20040329
20040331
20040401
20040408
20040412
20040413
20040416
20040421
20040422
20040423
20040426
20040504
20040507
20040511
20040513
20040517
20040518
20040519
20040520
20040524
20040525
20040602
20040603
20040607
20040608
20040610
20040614
20040617
20040618
20040621
20040622
20040623
20040624
20040628
20040629
20040630
20040706
20040707
20040708
20040709
20040712
20040713
20040714
20040715
20040719
20040721
20040726
20040727
20040728
20040802
20040803
20040804
20040809
20040812
20040817
20040818
20040819
20040823
20040824
20040825
20040830
20040831
20040901
20040907
20040909
20040913
20040920
20040921
20041005
20041013
20041015
20041018
20041019
20041021
20041022
20041025
20041101
20041103
20041104
20041109
20041110
20041112
20041115
20041116
20041117
20041119
20041123
20041129
20041130
20041201
20041203
20041206
20041209
20041215
20041216
20041222
20050119
20050125
20050202
20050204
20050210
20050216
20050217
20050224
20050401
20050407
20050412
20050503
20050504
20050506
20050511
20050513
20050516
20050523
20050524
20050603
20050606
20050616
20050627
20050630
20050808
20050811
20050812
20050817
20050912
20050914
20050920
20050923
20050925
20051003
20051011
20051014
20051017
20051024
20051025
20051028
20051101
20051107
20051115
20051116
20051117
20051118
20051128
20051130
20051202
20051206
20051207
20051212
20051219
20051220
20060118
20060121
20060125
20060126
20060127
20060202
20060207
20060208
20060216
20060217
20060221
20060222
20060227
20060228
20060301
20060302
20060303
20060306
20060308
20060313
20060315
20060316
20060317
20060320
20060323
20060324
20060329
20060330
20060331
20060401
20060402
20060403
20060404
20060405
20060406
20060407
20060409
20060410
20060411
20060412
20060413
20060414
20060415
20060416
20060417
20060418
20060420
20060421
20060422
20060423
20060426
20060427
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 7:09 PM
I have just received the newest compromise bill which reflects the Hegel-Martinez compromise language as well as a number of additional changes reflecting amendments pending at the time of the recess last week. There are a number of additional new sections making the bill come in at a whopping 614 pages.
We will be analyzing the text over the next days and will update our section by section summary to inform readers of the substance of the changes.
We will be analyzing the text over the next days and will update our section by section summary to inform readers of the substance of the changes.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 6:54 PM
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC: WILL A BORDER FENCE BE AN ENVIRONMENTAL NIGHTMARE?
National Geographic, not normally known for weighing in on political questions, has an article warning that a border fence could be harmful to wildlife in the region.
As the U.S. government debates major immigration reform, environmentalists warn that the proposed laws would also prevent animal migrants from crossing the country's southern border.
Specifically, the legislation's proposal to erect 700 miles (1,125 kilometers) of immigrant-stopping fence could block key wildlife migration routes in the Sonoran Desert along the U.S.-Mexico border.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 7:05 AM
READ GREG SISKIND'S COLUMN IN THIS MORNING'S MEMPHIS COMMERCIAL APPEAL
I've written an opinion article in this morning's Memphis Commercial Appeal newspaper about myths surrounding comprehensive immigration reform.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 6:44 AM
ABC NEWS POLL SHOWS PUBLIC OVERWHELMINGLY BACKS SENATE IMMIGRATION APPROACH OVER HOUSE VERSION
A new poll from ABC News and the Washington Post asked a number of immigration questions and findings were surprising
President Bush received poor marks for his handling of immigration with 33% approving and 61% disapproving.
The general public still ranks immigation low on the list of most important issues. Only 12% of members of the public consider immigration the most important issue and presumably views are split in that small number. This is consistent with other polls and this finding, compared with polls of Hispanic voters showing they overwhelmingly consider immigration the most important issue is giving Republicans some worries. They don't appear to be winning ovters with the anti-immigrant views, but there are clearly alienating the very important Hispanic voting community.
The public is now giving Democrats much higher marks on immigration issues than Republicans. 50% of the public approves the Democrats handling of the issue while Republicans only get 38% appvoal ratings.
75% of the public believes that we're not doing enough to thwart illegal immigration. But most, nearly 2/3, don't think that immigrants pose a threat to American workers.
The most interesting question, in my opinion was the following one which asked people to make choices regarding the major options being considered by Congress. Interesting, the House approach and the Frist approach are overwhelmingly unpopural.
21. I'll read three proposals for illegal immigrants who currently live and work in the United States. Please tell me which you prefer.
ONE: Let immigrants who have lived here a certain number
of years apply for legal status and eventually become
permanent citizens if they meet specific conditions,
like paying a fine and back taxes
TWO: Let them pay a fee and work here for a limited number
of years after which they'd have to leave the country
THREE: Declare all illegal immigrants to be felons and not
allow them to work here legally
Which of these would you prefer -
a program that may lead to legal status and permanent
citizenship,a program allowing them to work here for a
limited number of years but not remain permanently, or
no temporary work program and felony status?
Program that may lead to legal status and permanent citizenship 63
Program allowing them to work here but not remain permanently 14
No temporary work program and felony status 20
None of them (vol.) 2
No opinion 1
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 12:26 AM
XML newsfeed
archives
20030930
20031001
20031002
20031007
20031009
20031015
20031017
20031030
20031031
20031114
20031120
20040107
20040210
20040211
20040212
20040216
20040217
20040218
20040219
20040220
20040223
20040224
20040226
20040227
20040302
20040303
20040305
20040309
20040310
20040315
20040316
20040317
20040318
20040325
20040328
20040329
20040331
20040401
20040408
20040412
20040413
20040416
20040421
20040422
20040423
20040426
20040504
20040507
20040511
20040513
20040517
20040518
20040519
20040520
20040524
20040525
20040602
20040603
20040607
20040608
20040610
20040614
20040617
20040618
20040621
20040622
20040623
20040624
20040628
20040629
20040630
20040706
20040707
20040708
20040709
20040712
20040713
20040714
20040715
20040719
20040721
20040726
20040727
20040728
20040802
20040803
20040804
20040809
20040812
20040817
20040818
20040819
20040823
20040824
20040825
20040830
20040831
20040901
20040907
20040909
20040913
20040920
20040921
20041005
20041013
20041015
20041018
20041019
20041021
20041022
20041025
20041101
20041103
20041104
20041109
20041110
20041112
20041115
20041116
20041117
20041119
20041123
20041129
20041130
20041201
20041203
20041206
20041209
20041215
20041216
20041222
20050119
20050125
20050202
20050204
20050210
20050216
20050217
20050224
20050401
20050407
20050412
20050503
20050504
20050506
20050511
20050513
20050516
20050523
20050524
20050603
20050606
20050616
20050627
20050630
20050808
20050811
20050812
20050817
20050912
20050914
20050920
20050923
20050925
20051003
20051011
20051014
20051017
20051024
20051025
20051028
20051101
20051107
20051115
20051116
20051117
20051118
20051128
20051130
20051202
20051206
20051207
20051212
20051219
20051220
20060118
20060121
20060125
20060126
20060127
20060202
20060207
20060208
20060216
20060217
20060221
20060222
20060227
20060228
20060301
20060302
20060303
20060306
20060308
20060313
20060315
20060316
20060317
20060320
20060323
20060324
20060329
20060330
20060331
20060401
20060402
20060403
20060404
20060405
20060406
20060407
20060409
20060410
20060411
20060412
20060413
20060414
20060415
20060416
20060417
20060418
20060420
20060421
20060422
20060423
20060426
20060427
As the U.S. government debates major immigration reform, environmentalists warn that the proposed laws would also prevent animal migrants from crossing the country's southern border.
Specifically, the legislation's proposal to erect 700 miles (1,125 kilometers) of immigrant-stopping fence could block key wildlife migration routes in the Sonoran Desert along the U.S.-Mexico border.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 7:05 AM
I've written an opinion article in this morning's Memphis Commercial Appeal newspaper about myths surrounding comprehensive immigration reform.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 6:44 AM
ABC NEWS POLL SHOWS PUBLIC OVERWHELMINGLY BACKS SENATE IMMIGRATION APPROACH OVER HOUSE VERSION
A new poll from ABC News and the Washington Post asked a number of immigration questions and findings were surprising
President Bush received poor marks for his handling of immigration with 33% approving and 61% disapproving.
The general public still ranks immigation low on the list of most important issues. Only 12% of members of the public consider immigration the most important issue and presumably views are split in that small number. This is consistent with other polls and this finding, compared with polls of Hispanic voters showing they overwhelmingly consider immigration the most important issue is giving Republicans some worries. They don't appear to be winning ovters with the anti-immigrant views, but there are clearly alienating the very important Hispanic voting community.
The public is now giving Democrats much higher marks on immigration issues than Republicans. 50% of the public approves the Democrats handling of the issue while Republicans only get 38% appvoal ratings.
75% of the public believes that we're not doing enough to thwart illegal immigration. But most, nearly 2/3, don't think that immigrants pose a threat to American workers.
The most interesting question, in my opinion was the following one which asked people to make choices regarding the major options being considered by Congress. Interesting, the House approach and the Frist approach are overwhelmingly unpopural.
21. I'll read three proposals for illegal immigrants who currently live and work in the United States. Please tell me which you prefer.
ONE: Let immigrants who have lived here a certain number
of years apply for legal status and eventually become
permanent citizens if they meet specific conditions,
like paying a fine and back taxes
TWO: Let them pay a fee and work here for a limited number
of years after which they'd have to leave the country
THREE: Declare all illegal immigrants to be felons and not
allow them to work here legally
Which of these would you prefer -
a program that may lead to legal status and permanent
citizenship,a program allowing them to work here for a
limited number of years but not remain permanently, or
no temporary work program and felony status?
Program that may lead to legal status and permanent citizenship 63
Program allowing them to work here but not remain permanently 14
No temporary work program and felony status 20
None of them (vol.) 2
No opinion 1
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 12:26 AM
XML newsfeed
archives
20030930
20031001
20031002
20031007
20031009
20031015
20031017
20031030
20031031
20031114
20031120
20040107
20040210
20040211
20040212
20040216
20040217
20040218
20040219
20040220
20040223
20040224
20040226
20040227
20040302
20040303
20040305
20040309
20040310
20040315
20040316
20040317
20040318
20040325
20040328
20040329
20040331
20040401
20040408
20040412
20040413
20040416
20040421
20040422
20040423
20040426
20040504
20040507
20040511
20040513
20040517
20040518
20040519
20040520
20040524
20040525
20040602
20040603
20040607
20040608
20040610
20040614
20040617
20040618
20040621
20040622
20040623
20040624
20040628
20040629
20040630
20040706
20040707
20040708
20040709
20040712
20040713
20040714
20040715
20040719
20040721
20040726
20040727
20040728
20040802
20040803
20040804
20040809
20040812
20040817
20040818
20040819
20040823
20040824
20040825
20040830
20040831
20040901
20040907
20040909
20040913
20040920
20040921
20041005
20041013
20041015
20041018
20041019
20041021
20041022
20041025
20041101
20041103
20041104
20041109
20041110
20041112
20041115
20041116
20041117
20041119
20041123
20041129
20041130
20041201
20041203
20041206
20041209
20041215
20041216
20041222
20050119
20050125
20050202
20050204
20050210
20050216
20050217
20050224
20050401
20050407
20050412
20050503
20050504
20050506
20050511
20050513
20050516
20050523
20050524
20050603
20050606
20050616
20050627
20050630
20050808
20050811
20050812
20050817
20050912
20050914
20050920
20050923
20050925
20051003
20051011
20051014
20051017
20051024
20051025
20051028
20051101
20051107
20051115
20051116
20051117
20051118
20051128
20051130
20051202
20051206
20051207
20051212
20051219
20051220
20060118
20060121
20060125
20060126
20060127
20060202
20060207
20060208
20060216
20060217
20060221
20060222
20060227
20060228
20060301
20060302
20060303
20060306
20060308
20060313
20060315
20060316
20060317
20060320
20060323
20060324
20060329
20060330
20060331
20060401
20060402
20060403
20060404
20060405
20060406
20060407
20060409
20060410
20060411
20060412
20060413
20060414
20060415
20060416
20060417
20060418
20060420
20060421
20060422
20060423
20060426
20060427
President Bush received poor marks for his handling of immigration with 33% approving and 61% disapproving.
The general public still ranks immigation low on the list of most important issues. Only 12% of members of the public consider immigration the most important issue and presumably views are split in that small number. This is consistent with other polls and this finding, compared with polls of Hispanic voters showing they overwhelmingly consider immigration the most important issue is giving Republicans some worries. They don't appear to be winning ovters with the anti-immigrant views, but there are clearly alienating the very important Hispanic voting community.
The public is now giving Democrats much higher marks on immigration issues than Republicans. 50% of the public approves the Democrats handling of the issue while Republicans only get 38% appvoal ratings.
75% of the public believes that we're not doing enough to thwart illegal immigration. But most, nearly 2/3, don't think that immigrants pose a threat to American workers.
The most interesting question, in my opinion was the following one which asked people to make choices regarding the major options being considered by Congress. Interesting, the House approach and the Frist approach are overwhelmingly unpopural.
21. I'll read three proposals for illegal immigrants who currently live and work in the United States. Please tell me which you prefer.
ONE: Let immigrants who have lived here a certain number
of years apply for legal status and eventually become
permanent citizens if they meet specific conditions,
like paying a fine and back taxes
TWO: Let them pay a fee and work here for a limited number
of years after which they'd have to leave the country
THREE: Declare all illegal immigrants to be felons and not
allow them to work here legally
Which of these would you prefer -
a program that may lead to legal status and permanent
citizenship,a program allowing them to work here for a
limited number of years but not remain permanently, or
no temporary work program and felony status?
Program that may lead to legal status and permanent citizenship 63
Program allowing them to work here but not remain permanently 14
No temporary work program and felony status 20
None of them (vol.) 2
No opinion 1
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 12:26 AM
20031001
20031002
20031007
20031009
20031015
20031017
20031030
20031031
20031114
20031120
20040107
20040210
20040211
20040212
20040216
20040217
20040218
20040219
20040220
20040223
20040224
20040226
20040227
20040302
20040303
20040305
20040309
20040310
20040315
20040316
20040317
20040318
20040325
20040328
20040329
20040331
20040401
20040408
20040412
20040413
20040416
20040421
20040422
20040423
20040426
20040504
20040507
20040511
20040513
20040517
20040518
20040519
20040520
20040524
20040525
20040602
20040603
20040607
20040608
20040610
20040614
20040617
20040618
20040621
20040622
20040623
20040624
20040628
20040629
20040630
20040706
20040707
20040708
20040709
20040712
20040713
20040714
20040715
20040719
20040721
20040726
20040727
20040728
20040802
20040803
20040804
20040809
20040812
20040817
20040818
20040819
20040823
20040824
20040825
20040830
20040831
20040901
20040907
20040909
20040913
20040920
20040921
20041005
20041013
20041015
20041018
20041019
20041021
20041022
20041025
20041101
20041103
20041104
20041109
20041110
20041112
20041115
20041116
20041117
20041119
20041123
20041129
20041130
20041201
20041203
20041206
20041209
20041215
20041216
20041222
20050119
20050125
20050202
20050204
20050210
20050216
20050217
20050224
20050401
20050407
20050412
20050503
20050504
20050506
20050511
20050513
20050516
20050523
20050524
20050603
20050606
20050616
20050627
20050630
20050808
20050811
20050812
20050817
20050912
20050914
20050920
20050923
20050925
20051003
20051011
20051014
20051017
20051024
20051025
20051028
20051101
20051107
20051115
20051116
20051117
20051118
20051128
20051130
20051202
20051206
20051207
20051212
20051219
20051220
20060118
20060121
20060125
20060126
20060127
20060202
20060207
20060208
20060216
20060217
20060221
20060222
20060227
20060228
20060301
20060302
20060303
20060306
20060308
20060313
20060315
20060316
20060317
20060320
20060323
20060324
20060329
20060330
20060331
20060401
20060402
20060403
20060404
20060405
20060406
20060407
20060409
20060410
20060411
20060412
20060413
20060414
20060415
20060416
20060417
20060418
20060420
20060421
20060422
20060423
20060426
20060427

