Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

INS ADVISES ON CASES WHERE ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS APPLICANTS TURN 21 WHILE APPLICATION PENDING

The INS has commented on its policy in the case where a minor child of a permanent resident files for adjustment of status to permanent residency after his or her priority date becomes current, but the child turns 21 before the application is finished. The cutoff date for adult children of permanent residents is much later than for minor children. If the application had to be refiled, the delay in refiling due to the new cut off date would be approximately two years. INS headquarters addressed the question in a recent memorandum to all INS office directors. According to the INS, it is enough that an immigrant visa be available to an applicant at "the time his application is filed."

The INS stated in the memorandum that "It is Service policy that as long as the adjustment applicant remains eligible to receive an immigrant visa in the same basic visa classification under which he or she applied, the temporary unavailability of an immigrant visa does not invalidate the application, which will be held "in abeyance" until such time the visa priority date is reached again." Since immigrant visas for minor and adult children of permanent residents are allocated from the same pool (the Family 2A and 2B categories), reassignment from one category to the other does not destroy the applicant's eligibility for permanent resident status. Unless a case presents valid additional grounds for denial, INS offices are instructed simply to hold the application without making a decision on it.

The INS distinguished the above scenario from that of a child accompanying or following to join a principal visa beneficiary (such as a parent being sponsored by a new permanent resident spouse). The child in this case would lose entitlement to immigration by virtue of reaching the age of 21 unless the child becomes the direct beneficiary of a new visa petition filed on his or her behalf by the original petitioner.

The INS has directed INS offices to approve motions to reopen and reinstate in cases where the applications were mistakenly denied.

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.