Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

LULAC/CSS AMNESTY LITIGATION UPDATE

The Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law (CHRCL), the non-profit organization that serves as plaintiffs' counsel in the amnesty litigation class action suits, has issued a detailed document entitled "A PROPOSAL FOR REGULARLIZING THE STATUS OF CERTAIN PERSONS BLOCKED FROM APPLYING FOR LEGALIZATION UNDER THE IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986."

The amnesty cases stem from the legalization program that allowed people in the mid-1980s to become permanent residents if they could prove that they were continuously present since 1982. The INS created a number of requirements that were arguably illegal and turned away a number of people who should have been qualified. Many other people failed to apply because they heard about the INS "frontdesking" policy of turning people away without even accepting their applications.

Those turned away ahve been fighting the INS in years in the courts in two class action cases - LULAC v. INS and CSS v. Reno. Congress stepped in and passed legislation in the 1996 Immigration Act that stripped federal courts of authority hear legalization claims.

CHRCL is proposing a plan to deal with the cases:

1) The INS should accept and adjudicate legalization applications from members of the certified classes in the legalization cases who establish that they visited INS offices during the one-year application period, but were erroneously told they were ineligible to legalize, irrespective of whether they had managed to obtain and fill out official application forms. The Administration retains the legal authority to grant this relief without additional legislation.

2) Persons whom the INS discouraged from visiting a legalization office by way of false and misleading publicity should be granted deferred enforced departure for two years while legislation similar to the 1997 NACARA bill, benefiting Cuban, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran and Guatemalan nationals, is pursued on their behalf.

The CHRCL provides considerable detail in its proposal and we will report as others sign on to this deal.

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.