Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room

Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
The Visalaw Blog



< back



One of the provisions in the last minute massive budget bill we have been discussing throughout this issue is the implementation in US law of Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture. The provision is enacted in Section 2242 of H.R. 4328, the Omnibus Budget Bill.

That section states the following:

"It shall be the policy of the United States not to expel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be

in danger of being subjected to torture, regardless of whether

the person is physically present in the United States.

REGULATIONS.- Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the heads of the appropriate agencies shall prescribe regulations to implement the obligations of the United States under Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, subject to any reservations, understandings, declarations, and provisos contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the Convention."

The Congress and the President's enactment of the UN convention comes in the wake of an important Board of Immigration Appeals decision in a recent case that states that the BIA lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate a claim for relief from deportation pursuant to Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture. The BIA states as the basis for its decision that there has been no specific legislation to implement the provisions of Article 3, no regulations have been promulgated with respect to Article 3 and the United States Senate has declared that Article 3 is a non-self-executing treaty provision. Presumably, that case would not have the same result if decided today.

The United States is a signatory to the 1984 treaty and the INS actually approved a case on the basis of the Torture Treaty earlier this year. We reported on this case in our May 1998 newsletter.

In May, the INS indicated that there were 80 other cases pending that were relying on this Treaty. The INS has not issued any statements regarding how it will handle these cases now and how it plans to comply with the law's four month deadline to issue regulations.

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search

This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright  2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.