Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

DALLAS NEWSPAPER REPORT SHINES LIGHT ON SECRET INDEFINITE DETENTIONS

The Dallas Morning News, through Freedom of Information Requests and many months of research and investigation, has obtained information that the INS has been holding 294 people for over three years.  Not only has the INS had custody of these people, who are not serving criminal sentences, they will not release their names, nor the names of about 5000 other detainees. 

According to the INS, the agency cannot release the names of the detainees because of a Justice Department policy.  While the federal Privacy Act applies only to citizens and permanent aliens, in 1996 Janet Reno decided to extend the Act’s protection to all people in the US, regardless of immigration status.  The impetus for this decision was a 1994 Senate race in California, in which both candidates were accused of hiring illegal immigrants. 

The purpose of the law may have been to protect privacy, but reliance on it in this situation has been severely criticized by many bar leaders.  Philip Anderson, immediate past president of the American Bar Association, calls the practice of withholding names of detainees “contrary to the basic precepts of this country.”  Most states and the federal government reveal the names of their prisoners.  A spokesperson for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Glen Castlebury, points out why the INS’ refusal to reveal names is worrisome:  “It’s pretty fundamental when the state takes custody of someone, they have to account for what they’ve done with that person.  I sometimes wonder if (INS officials) are reluctant because they don’t know where their people are.” 

This may well be part of the problem.  A decade ago the INS housed detainees in only a few facilities.  Today, however, the INS uses 190 facilities in 24 different states, only a few of which are exclusively for INS detainees. 

Most of the 294 detainees are from countries with which the US does not have diplomatic relations, meaning they are not deportable.  However, according to records obtained by the Dallas Morning News, 47 of the detainees are from countries with which the US does have relations, including Mexico, India and Poland.  There is no explanation why these people are still in custody.

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.