Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

PROPOSITION 187 SUPPORTERS SEEK TO PLACE SIMILAR MEASURE ON 2000 CALIFORNIA BALLOT

California is often considered an indicator of future trends in the US.  Fashion, food and even laws find their start in California.  For example, California passed Proposition 187, a harshly anti-immigrant measure in 1994, and in 1996 Congress followed suit with a law that went even further in some respects.  Most provisions of Proposition 187 were declared unconstitutional by a federal judge, and the measure itself died this summer amid legal negotiations.  However, the sentiments that motivated Proposition 187 have not gone away.  Supporters of the measure have requested the California Attorney General issue an official title for their new proposal, a state constitutional amendment that would have much the same effect as Proposition 187.  Issuing a title is the first step in placing the measure on the ballot. After that, 670,816 signatures must be obtained.

The amendment would prohibit the California Legislature from approving any new laws designed to provide benefits for undocumented immigrants.  It would also mandate that police officers check the immigration status of every person who is arrested.  It would further require state agencies to verify the identity and eligibility of all applicants for public benefits. 

Thus far, California Governor Gray Davis has declined to comment on the new proposal, saying he will not until the measure is officially on the ballot.  Gov. Davis, elected after Proposition 187 was passed, is on record opposing the measure.

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.