Siskind Susser

Green Card LotteryABCs of ImmigrationHiring A LawyerHealth Care Info CenterImmigration SitesFashion, Arts & / Sports Newsletter

Siskind Immigration Bulletin Request Consultation Ask Visalaw Client Login
About the Firm
Our Offices
Our Team
In the News
Practice Areas and Services
Scheduling a Consultation
ABCs of Immigration
Requests For Proposals
Press Room


Immigration Forms
Government Processing Times
State Department Visa Bulletin
Siskind's Immigration Professional
Working in America
Washington Updates
Publications
The Visalaw Blog

MEMBER OF THE
AMERICAN
IMMIGRATION
LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION


LAUNCH CHAT

< back

 

INS ANNOUNCES NEW POLICY ON LONG-TERM DETENTION

With an increasing number of federal judges declaring the INS practice of indefinite detention unconstitutional, Attorney General Janet Reno and INS Commissioner Doris Meissner announced last month that new procedures for review of long-term detention cases had been developed and were immediately effective. There are over 2,400 people in essentially permanent INS custody because they are undeportable, and 15,000 people in custody pending deportation at any one time.

Under the new procedures, once the INS takes a person against whom there is a final order of removal into custody, the propriety of continued custody must be reviewed by the District Director within 90-days. Within 30 days of this custody determination, the INS must provide the detainee with written notification of the release decision. If the decision is to release, the notice must give the conditions of release. If the decision is to continue custody, the notice must specify the factors behind the Director’s decision.

If detention is continued, a second review must be held within either nine months of the final order of removal or six months from the first custody review, whichever is longer. The detainee must receive written notice of this hearing at least 30 days before it is held. The notice is also to specify factors relevant to the custody determination, and that the detainee has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that they are not a threat to the community and are likely to comply with the removal order. The detainee must be interviewed at this stage, and to continue detention both the District Director and INS headquarters must agree.

If release is not authorized at this stage, the District Director must conduct reviews of the detention every six months, and at least once a year INS headquarters must concur to continue detention.

Among the factors that will be considered in continuing detention are the detainee’s criminal history, any immigration violations, violence while incarcerated or detained, their rehabilitation, and their ties to the community.

< Back | Next >

Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.

Siskind Susser Bland
1028 Oakhaven Rd.
Memphis, TN 38119
T. 800-343-4890 or 901-682-6455
F. 901-682-6394
Email: info@visalaw.com

Home | Immigration Bulletin | Green Card Lottery Center | ABCs of Immigration | Hiring A Lawyer
Hot Topics | Health Care Info Center | Immigration Sites | Search



This is an advertisement. Certification as an Immigration Specialist is not currently available in Tennessee. Siskind Susser Bland limits its practice strictly to immigration law, a Federal practice area, and we do not claim expertise in the laws of states other than where our attorneys are licensed. Siskind Susser Bland does not retain clients on the strength of advertising materials alone but only after following our own engagement procedures (e.g. interviews, conflict checks, retainer agreements). The information contained on this site is intended to educate members of the public generally and is not intended to provide solutions to individual problems. Readers are cautioned not to attempt to solve individual problems on the basis of information contained herein and are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel before relying on information on this site. Siskind Susser Bland and its advertisers are independent of each other and advertisers on this site are not being endorsed by Siskind Susser Bland by virtue of the fact that they appear on this page. Site is maintained by Siskind Susser Bland's Memphis, TN office and overseen by Gregory Siskind. Copyright © 2003-2006 Siskind Susser Bland. All rights reserved.