Friday, April 23, 2010
This blog has moved
This blog is now located at http://i9compliance.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.
For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://i9compliance.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 12:17 PM
Thursday, April 22, 2010
SAN DIEGO BAKERY OWNER INDICTED FOR HIRING UNDOCUMENTED WORKERS
From ICE:
A San Diego-area French bakery, along with its owner and a manager, are charged in a 16-count indictment unsealed Wednesday resulting from an investigation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) into allegations the business knowingly hired undocumented workers. The French Gourmet, Inc, of San Diego, Calif., together with its president and one of the company's managers, are accused in the indictment handed down by a federal grand jury here April 15. The indictment alleges the defendants conspired to engage in a pattern or practice of hiring and continuing to employee unauthorized workers, a misdemeanor, in addition to 14 felony counts, including making false statements and shielding undocumented alien employees from detection.
Also named in the indictment are the bakery's owner, Michel Malecot, 52, and a company manager, Richard Kauffman, 51, both of San Diego. The men are charged with 12 felony counts for making false statements and shielding undocumented alien employees working at the bakery from detection. They were arraigned Wednesday. If convicted, Malecot and Kauffman face a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine on each count.
The indictment also seeks criminal forfeiture of proceeds gained from the corporation's unlawful activities.
"Employers have a responsibility for maintaining the integrity of their workforce," said Mike Carney, acting special agent in charge for ICE Office of Investigations in San Diego, "This indictment shows ICE's commitment to holding businesses accountable when they repeatedly ignore immigration laws as it relates to their workforce. The goal of our enforcement effort is two-fold, first to reduce the demand for illegal employment and, second, to protect job opportunities for the nation's lawful workforce."
According to the indictment, the company's managers, including Malecot and Kauffman, certified on the firm 's Employment Verification Forms (I-9) that the documents they examined appeared to be genuine, and to the best of the their knowledge, the employees listed on the I-9 were eligible to work in the United States.
The managers then put the illegal workers on the company's payroll and paid them by paycheck until they received "no match" letters from the Social Security Administration (SSA) advising that the Social Security numbers being used by the employees did not match the names of the rightful owners of those Social Security numbers.
After receiving the "no match" letters, The French Gourmet, Inc., then allegedly conspired to pay the undocumented employees in cash until the workers produced a new set of employment documents with different Social Security numbers.
In May 2008, ICE agents executed a federal search warrant at The French Gourmet and arrested 18 undocumented workers. During the searches, ICE agents seized employee and payroll records as evidence in the criminal case.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 1:33 PM
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
ICE CONFIRMS EMPLOYERS HAVE TEN DAYS TO CORRECT TECHNICAL VIOLATIONS
Tracker I-9 reports that employers have ten days to correct non-substantive, technical violations after an ICE audit. ICE confirmed this policy in a recent meeting with representatives of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. According to Tracker:
In response to questions by AILA, ICE confirmed that penalties were still based on INS guidance from the late 1990s, which categorized I-9 errors into two groups: substantive verification failures, which are not subject to the ten-day correction period, and technical or procedural verification failures, which may be corrected. Substantive errors could arise, for example, when the employee fails to sign section 1 or forgets to check one of the boxes indicating his or her citizenship or immigration status. Technical or procedural violations tend to be more benign in nature including, for example, the failure of the employee to enter his or her maiden name, address, or birth date in Section 1 or failure of the employer to provide the title, business name, and business address in Section 2. It’s important to note, however, that an employer must have made a good faith effort to comply with the I-9 requirements in order to take advantage of the ten-day correction period. So if an employer repeatedly made mistakes in knowing reliance of the 10 day correction period or attempted to correct the errors by back-dating, ICE may very well fine them to the fullest extent.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 8:33 AM
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
GROUPS PUSH FOR OREGON COUNTIES TO ADD EMPLOYER SANCTIONS MEASURE TO BALLOT IN NOVEMBER
Voters in Marion and Polk Counties may see a referendum on the ballot in November that would require employers with more than five employees to use E-Verify.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 8:27 PM
SANTA MARIA, CA TO BEGIN USING E-VERIFY ON MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES
From the Santa Maria Times:
Use of E-Verify — a federal program designed to help employers determine whether prospective employees are legally entitled to work in the United States — will be incorporated into the city of Santa Maria’s hiring process.
The City Council adopted the program on a six-month trial basis with a unanimous vote Tuesday.
However, a motion by Mayor Larry Lavagnino to appoint a committee of city department heads to review, research and study E-Verify use for city vendors, contractors, and any firm doing business with the city during the trial period, as suggested by city staff, was not seconded.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 12:27 PM
Sunday, April 18, 2010
DOJ SUES JOHN JAY COLLEGE FOR IRCA DISCRIMINATION VIOLATIONS
The New York Times reports that the Justice Department is suing John Jay College of Criminal Justice over a claim that it demanded more evidence of work authorization from at least 103 people since 2007 than required under I-9 rules. DOJ is seeking fines of $1,100 for each individual plus unspecified measures to address the effects of the discrimination.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 8:49 PM
Monday, April 12, 2010
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES SETTLES RICO SUIT FOR $18 MILLION
Mohawk Industries has settled in a six year old class action suit filed by former employees who claim that the company's practice of hiring illegally worker depressed their wages. Mohawk settled the suit for $18 million. Attorneys will get a third of the award and the remainder will be put in to a fund that will go to the 48,000 current and former hourly-paid Mohawk employees. Mohawk did not admit to any of the charges.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 7:43 PM
XML newsfeed
archives
April 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
This blog is now located at http://i9compliance.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.
For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://i9compliance.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default.
A San Diego-area French bakery, along with its owner and a manager, are charged in a 16-count indictment unsealed Wednesday resulting from an investigation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) into allegations the business knowingly hired undocumented workers.The French Gourmet, Inc, of San Diego, Calif., together with its president and one of the company's managers, are accused in the indictment handed down by a federal grand jury here April 15. The indictment alleges the defendants conspired to engage in a pattern or practice of hiring and continuing to employee unauthorized workers, a misdemeanor, in addition to 14 felony counts, including making false statements and shielding undocumented alien employees from detection.
Also named in the indictment are the bakery's owner, Michel Malecot, 52, and a company manager, Richard Kauffman, 51, both of San Diego. The men are charged with 12 felony counts for making false statements and shielding undocumented alien employees working at the bakery from detection. They were arraigned Wednesday. If convicted, Malecot and Kauffman face a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine on each count.
The indictment also seeks criminal forfeiture of proceeds gained from the corporation's unlawful activities.
"Employers have a responsibility for maintaining the integrity of their workforce," said Mike Carney, acting special agent in charge for ICE Office of Investigations in San Diego, "This indictment shows ICE's commitment to holding businesses accountable when they repeatedly ignore immigration laws as it relates to their workforce. The goal of our enforcement effort is two-fold, first to reduce the demand for illegal employment and, second, to protect job opportunities for the nation's lawful workforce."
According to the indictment, the company's managers, including Malecot and Kauffman, certified on
the firm 's Employment Verification Forms (I-9) that the documents they examined appeared to be genuine, and to the best of the their knowledge, the employees listed on the I-9 were eligible to work in the United States.The managers then put the illegal workers on the company's payroll and paid them by paycheck until they received "no match" letters from the Social Security Administration (SSA) advising that the Social Security numbers being used by the employees did not match the names of the rightful owners of those Social Security numbers.
After receiving the "no match" letters, The French Gourmet, Inc., then allegedly conspired to pay the undocumented employees in cash until the workers produced a new set of employment documents with different Social Security numbers.
In May 2008, ICE agents executed a federal search warrant at The French Gourmet and arrested 18 undocumented workers. During the searches, ICE agents seized employee and payroll records as evidence in the criminal case.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
ICE CONFIRMS EMPLOYERS HAVE TEN DAYS TO CORRECT TECHNICAL VIOLATIONS
Tracker I-9 reports that employers have ten days to correct non-substantive, technical violations after an ICE audit. ICE confirmed this policy in a recent meeting with representatives of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. According to Tracker:
In response to questions by AILA, ICE confirmed that penalties were still based on INS guidance from the late 1990s, which categorized I-9 errors into two groups: substantive verification failures, which are not subject to the ten-day correction period, and technical or procedural verification failures, which may be corrected. Substantive errors could arise, for example, when the employee fails to sign section 1 or forgets to check one of the boxes indicating his or her citizenship or immigration status. Technical or procedural violations tend to be more benign in nature including, for example, the failure of the employee to enter his or her maiden name, address, or birth date in Section 1 or failure of the employer to provide the title, business name, and business address in Section 2. It’s important to note, however, that an employer must have made a good faith effort to comply with the I-9 requirements in order to take advantage of the ten-day correction period. So if an employer repeatedly made mistakes in knowing reliance of the 10 day correction period or attempted to correct the errors by back-dating, ICE may very well fine them to the fullest extent.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 8:33 AM
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
GROUPS PUSH FOR OREGON COUNTIES TO ADD EMPLOYER SANCTIONS MEASURE TO BALLOT IN NOVEMBER
Voters in Marion and Polk Counties may see a referendum on the ballot in November that would require employers with more than five employees to use E-Verify.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 8:27 PM
SANTA MARIA, CA TO BEGIN USING E-VERIFY ON MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES
From the Santa Maria Times:
Use of E-Verify — a federal program designed to help employers determine whether prospective employees are legally entitled to work in the United States — will be incorporated into the city of Santa Maria’s hiring process.
The City Council adopted the program on a six-month trial basis with a unanimous vote Tuesday.
However, a motion by Mayor Larry Lavagnino to appoint a committee of city department heads to review, research and study E-Verify use for city vendors, contractors, and any firm doing business with the city during the trial period, as suggested by city staff, was not seconded.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 12:27 PM
Sunday, April 18, 2010
DOJ SUES JOHN JAY COLLEGE FOR IRCA DISCRIMINATION VIOLATIONS
The New York Times reports that the Justice Department is suing John Jay College of Criminal Justice over a claim that it demanded more evidence of work authorization from at least 103 people since 2007 than required under I-9 rules. DOJ is seeking fines of $1,100 for each individual plus unspecified measures to address the effects of the discrimination.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 8:49 PM
Monday, April 12, 2010
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES SETTLES RICO SUIT FOR $18 MILLION
Mohawk Industries has settled in a six year old class action suit filed by former employees who claim that the company's practice of hiring illegally worker depressed their wages. Mohawk settled the suit for $18 million. Attorneys will get a third of the award and the remainder will be put in to a fund that will go to the 48,000 current and former hourly-paid Mohawk employees. Mohawk did not admit to any of the charges.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 7:43 PM
XML newsfeed
archives
April 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
In response to questions by AILA, ICE confirmed that penalties were still based on INS guidance from the late 1990s, which categorized I-9 errors into two groups: substantive verification failures, which are not subject to the ten-day correction period, and technical or procedural verification failures, which may be corrected. Substantive errors could arise, for example, when the employee fails to sign section 1 or forgets to check one of the boxes indicating his or her citizenship or immigration status. Technical or procedural violations tend to be more benign in nature including, for example, the failure of the employee to enter his or her maiden name, address, or birth date in Section 1 or failure of the employer to provide the title, business name, and business address in Section 2.It’s important to note, however, that an employer must have made a good faith effort to comply with the I-9 requirements in order to take advantage of the ten-day correction period. So if an employer repeatedly made mistakes in knowing reliance of the 10 day correction period or attempted to correct the errors by back-dating, ICE may very well fine them to the fullest extent.
SANTA MARIA, CA TO BEGIN USING E-VERIFY ON MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES
From the Santa Maria Times:
Use of E-Verify — a federal program designed to help employers determine whether prospective employees are legally entitled to work in the United States — will be incorporated into the city of Santa Maria’s hiring process.
The City Council adopted the program on a six-month trial basis with a unanimous vote Tuesday.
However, a motion by Mayor Larry Lavagnino to appoint a committee of city department heads to review, research and study E-Verify use for city vendors, contractors, and any firm doing business with the city during the trial period, as suggested by city staff, was not seconded.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 12:27 PM
Sunday, April 18, 2010
DOJ SUES JOHN JAY COLLEGE FOR IRCA DISCRIMINATION VIOLATIONS
The New York Times reports that the Justice Department is suing John Jay College of Criminal Justice over a claim that it demanded more evidence of work authorization from at least 103 people since 2007 than required under I-9 rules. DOJ is seeking fines of $1,100 for each individual plus unspecified measures to address the effects of the discrimination.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 8:49 PM
Monday, April 12, 2010
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES SETTLES RICO SUIT FOR $18 MILLION
Mohawk Industries has settled in a six year old class action suit filed by former employees who claim that the company's practice of hiring illegally worker depressed their wages. Mohawk settled the suit for $18 million. Attorneys will get a third of the award and the remainder will be put in to a fund that will go to the 48,000 current and former hourly-paid Mohawk employees. Mohawk did not admit to any of the charges.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 7:43 PM
XML newsfeed
archives
April 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
Use of E-Verify — a federal program designed to help employers determine whether prospective employees are legally entitled to work in the United States — will be incorporated into the city of Santa Maria’s hiring process.
The City Council adopted the program on a six-month trial basis with a unanimous vote Tuesday.
However, a motion by Mayor Larry Lavagnino to appoint a committee of city department heads to review, research and study E-Verify use for city vendors, contractors, and any firm doing business with the city during
the trial period, as suggested by city staff, was not seconded.
Monday, April 12, 2010
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES SETTLES RICO SUIT FOR $18 MILLION
Mohawk Industries has settled in a six year old class action suit filed by former employees who claim that the company's practice of hiring illegally worker depressed their wages. Mohawk settled the suit for $18 million. Attorneys will get a third of the award and the remainder will be put in to a fund that will go to the 48,000 current and former hourly-paid Mohawk employees. Mohawk did not admit to any of the charges.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 7:43 PM
XML newsfeed
archives
April 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010

