Openers
Dear Readers:
This week opened with a very
disturbing proposed regulation being released by the US Department of Labor
regarding labor certifications for green card cases. The rule is ostensibly
being released as a response to what the Labor Department says is an
“emerging” black market in labor certifications. The rule would end the long
standing policy of allowing employers to substitute workers on petitions, it
would require employers to file I-140 petitions within 45 days of a labor
certification being approved and it would actually bar employees and third
parties from paying attorneys fees.
The Labor Department states
over and over again that there is a serious problem with fraud and abuse, yet
the preamble to the proposed rules only list a couple of cases and provide no
statistics to back up the claims. The Labor Department has processed hundreds of
thousands of cases over the last few years. If only a tiny percentage involved
fraud, does it make sense to dramatically change the system? And every example
of fraud cited by DOL is a crime punishable by prison (in fact, the one major
case DOL cited several times did result in an attorney being imprisoned). Why is
better enforcement of existing law not the solution here?
There are also serious
questions raised about whether it is ever appropriate for a government agency to
interfere with an individual’s ability to access legal counsel. The DOL simply
states that because the employer is the petitioner in a labor certification
case, the employer should be paying the fee. But it is the employee that bears
the consequences when the labor certification process runs into trouble. For
example, a properly pending labor certification allows a worker to continue
remaining in H-1B status, access to 245i benefits, a priority date in queues
that may be several years long, etc. An employer obviously has an interest in a
case being successful, but the reality is that the employee’s life is more
adversely affected when the case runs into problems.
Some employers are also not in
the position to hire an attorney (especially non-profits charitable
organization) and will be likely to go the do-it-yourself route. Is it fair to
either those employers or their employees to not allow them to negotiate a deal
that works for both? The DOL rules does not even mention a link between the
prevailing wage and attorneys fees as they did in the H-1B regulations of a few
years ago. So an employee making considerably over the prevailing wage still
would not have the right to pay an attorney.
In many cases, particularly at
universities, the employer has non-attorney staff handling labor certifications.
But because of limited resources, cases don’t move quickly and employees grow
frustrated. Some of these employers give employees the option of choosing to
hire their own attorneys to manage the process as long as the employee pays.
These types of very reasonable arrangements would be barred under the proposed
rule.
For years I have encouraged
arrangements where employers and employees each hire their own counsel to
jointly work on a labor certification case. That way, when a conflict develops,
each side would have their own representation and both employer and employee
would be free to communicate with counsel and direct them to take actions that
protect their interests. Those types of arrangements, routinely encouraged by
ethics specialists, would be effectively barred by this regulation.
Presumably, many of our readers
will be upset by this rule. Fortunately, this is only a PROPOSAL and there is
time to make your voices heard. The Labor Department is required to review
comments on the rule and those comments may be submitted during the 60 day
period that began on February 13th.
The proposed rule can be found
in the February 13th Federal Register.
We’ve posted the regulation on our web site at www.visalaw.com/DOL.pdf
and you can download it there. The more comments DOL receives, the more likely
they will be to modify or abandon the proposal. Our own law firm is working on a
comment which I will publish when it is ready and I encourage many of the
thousands of lawyers, employers and employees who read this newsletter to do the
same.
*****
As
always, we remind readers that we're lawyers who make our living representing
immigration clients and employers seeking to comply with immigration laws. We
would love to discuss becoming your law firm. Just go to http://www.visalaw.com/intake.html
to request an appointment or call us at 800-748-3819 or 901-682-6455.
Regards,
Greg
Siskind
Index | Next >
Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.