News from the Courts
Burke
v. Mukasey,
(5th Cir. Dec. 10, 2007)
A
conviction for third-degree criminal possession of stolen property under NY
Penal Law §165.50 is an aggravated felony theft offense under INA §101(a)(43)(G).
Petitioner
was convicted of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree in
violation of NY Penal Law §165.50. The immigration judge found Petitioner
removable as a result of his conviction for an aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(G).
The BIA affirmed.
Under
NY Penal Law §165.50,
[a]
person is guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree
when he knowingly possesses stolen property, with intent to benefit himself or a
person other than an owner thereof or to impede the recovery by an owner
thereof, and when the value of the property exceeds three thousand dollars.
Under
INA §101(a)(43)(G), "a theft offense (including receipt of stolen
property)" is an aggravated felony. In Hernandez-Mancilla v. INS,
246 F.3d 1002, 1009 (7th Cir. 2001), the Seventh Circuit found that the
"modern, generic and broad definition" of §101(a)(43) includes
"a taking of property or an exercise of control over property without
consent with the criminal intent to deprive the owner of rights and benefits of
ownership, even if such deprivation is less than total or permanent." See
also United States v. Corona-Sanchez, 291 F.3d 1201, 1205 (9th Cir. 2002)
(en banc); United States v. Vasquez-Flores, 265 F.3d 1122, 1125 (10th
Cir. 2001). The court formally adopted this interpretation and found that the
elements necessary for conviction under NY Penal Code §165.50 "plainly
fall within the generic definition used in [INA §101(a)(43)(G)]."
The
court explained that similar to the generic definition, "possess"
under
Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.