News From The Courts
Ahmad
v. INS
Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals
2004
U.S. App. LEXIS 2228
The
Petitioner, a native and citizen of Pakistan and of Indian descent, appealed the
BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen in consideration of his Convention
Against Torture (CAT) claim. In the
decision, the BIA took notice of a regime change in Pakistan following the
Petitioner’s filing of a motion to reopen.
This change affected the BIA’s determination of the probability of
future torture.
The
Court ruled that before taking notice of a change of government and the possible
effects of the change on the Petitioner’s claim, the BIA must give the parties
notice and opportunity to respond or show cause why administrative notice should
not be taken.
The
Court held that the BIA violated the Petitioner’s Fifth Amendment Due Process
rights by failing to give the Petitioner notice, before the decision was issued,
of the BIA’s reliance on the regime change.
Without this knowledge, the Petitioner was unable to show that the regime
change did not preclude the possibility of torture.
*****
Zagaryan
v. Ashcroft
Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals
2004
U.S. App. LEXIS 2595
Edmond
Avanes Zagaryan, a citizen of Armenia,
petitioned for review of the denial of his application for asylum, withholding
of removal, and protection under Convention Against Torture (CAT).
The
Ninth Circuit found that the evidence did not support the IJ’s determination
that the Appellant’s account of his subjection to a pattern of beatings, death
threats, and conscription, was not credible.
The IJ erred in determining that that the Appellant failed to show that
the government was unable or unwilling to protect him with the Appellant
provided evidence that compels a finding that the beatings, threats, and
arrangements for him to be conscripted were committed by government forces.
The court also found that the omissions and inconsistencies cited by the
IJ were minor and did not go to heart of alien's claim.
The Appellant’s petition was granted and remanded for further proceedings.
< Back | Index | Next >
Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk.