The
farming community of
Immokalee
,
FL
was hard-hit by Hurricane
Wilma. The
Houston Chronicle reports that as many as 25,000 migrant workers from
Mexico
and
Central America
come to this town at this
time of year to pick crops, nearly doubling its population.
With many of the crops destroyed, these workers are out of jobs and
looking for work.
Florida
officials said that the
crop damage could go into the hundreds of millions of dollars, particularly
hitting the winter crop supply. In
Immokalee, many of the migrant workers have suffered significant losses due to
the storm, and are not insured. The total of insured losses from the hurricane
is estimated to be in the $2 to $10 billion range.
*****
The
Supreme Court has agreed to clarify the rights of undocumented immigrants who
have lived in the
United States
for an extended period of
time and seek permission to stay in the
US
. The court’s ruling will
concern a provision of a 1996 law that tightens restrictions on undocumented
immigrants. The justices will
decide if that provision applies to those who were in the country when the law
went into effect. The law states
that deportees who re-enter the country illegally are limited in their abilities
to become legal residents. The
court will be hearing the case of
Utah
resident, Humberto
Fernandez-Vargas. Fernandez-Vargas has lived in the
U.S.
since the 1970s, and has
been deported several times, the most recent in 1981.
He is now married and has a teenage son, as well as runs a trucking
company. In 2001, he filed to
become a legal resident, and was arrested due to the 1996 law and sent to
Juarez
,
Mexico
.
*****
The
Department of Homeland Security plans on improving the national biometric
tracking program. Under this plan,
visitors will be required to submit ten fingerprints into the US VISIT system.
The current system requires the submission of two fingerprints and a
photograph for comparison against known or suspected terrorists.
The ten-fingerprint plan was announced by Secretary Michael Chertoff in
July, and is expected to improve US VISIT.
This new plan will make the system better suited to the FBI’s
fingerprint system, which now contains approximately 1.5 million fingerprints.
Technology issues may arise, due to the fact that the new system should
require the same amount of processing time as the two-fingerprint system.
Despite the progress of US VISIT, it is still somewhat limited.
Mexicans with border crossing cards as well as Canadian citizens are not
required to submit information into the system.
Program director James Williams said that DHS is looking into radio
frequency ID cards for visitors who enter the
US
through land ports, which
could be easily scanned through checkpoints.
Hopefully this technology will be in effect by the end of 2006.
*****
The
Associated Press reported last week that
Richmond
,
Kentucky
would begin issuing
immigrant ID cards next week, regardless of the legal status of the immigrant.
This move could make the city the first in the nation to issue such
identification cards, and may also draw the city into the national debate over
immigration reform. A $10 fee will be charged for the cards, which will be
offered as part of a first-ever Latino citizen’s police academy at a local
church. City officials stated that the cards will be used for identification
only, cannot be used to obtain a driver’s license, and that they should help
immigrants to perform more easily the tasks that most citizens take for granted,
such as cashing checks and identifying themselves to authorities. Two forms of
identification are required to receive an ID card, such as a birth certificate
or picture ID, along with proof of residence in
Madison
County
or
Richmond
. The 2000 Census showed
that 328 Hispanics live in
Madison
County
, but experts believe that
the number is actually much higher. John Keeley, of the Center for Immigration
Studies in
Washington
,
DC
, stated that the city’s
decision was tantamount to “aiding and abetting” undocumented immigrants.
*****
The
National Bureau of Economic Research recently published the results of a study
on the effects of immigrants on the wages of U.S.-born workers. The study
researched the negative impact of immigrant workers on less educated American
workers in particular and all U.S.-born workers in general. The study tested the
skill differences between
U.S.
and foreign workers to see
if they are imperfectly substitutable for each other. It assumed that U.S. and
foreign workers with a similar education level and experience may be imperfectly
substitutable, meaning that foreign-born workers may not be as suitable
employees as U.S.-born workers, and that, since immigrants typically accept
lower wages, U.S.-born workers will not achieve the same rate of pay. However,
the study found that overall immigration positively affects the average wages of
U.S.-born workers, as evidenced by the impact of immigration on average wages
and housing values throughout the
U.S.
*****
The
New York Times reported recently that
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released the findings of a study on
the number of visitors to the
United States
that overstay their visas.
According to the study, the current system does not pose as an adequate threat
to visitors who become illegal immigrants by overstaying their visas. In 2004,
the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency received 301,046 leads on
possible visa violators, but only followed up on 4,164 with only 671 arrests.
The study also stated that many of these cases would face deportation, which
usually only occurs if the person has a criminal history. Estimates from the
study show that approximately 3.6 million of an estimated
9 to 10
million illegal immigrants
are people who have overstayed their visas. The report also stated that ICE
officials were unable to keep up with the enormous amounts of leads they
received, which brings into question the agency’s ability to identify, locate,
and apprehend visa violators effectively. Michael J. Garcia, the former director
of ICE, commented in the report that the agency focused more on the threat to
the community than on the age of the lead. Mr. Garcia also stated that many of
the leads received by ICE cannot be pursued because the individual may have
already left the country or because they are inaccurate.
*****
The
Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) recently
released an Approval of H1-B Petitions Exceeded 65,000 Cap in Fiscal Year 2005
in response to a March letter from Sen. Charles Grassley, Chairman of the Senate
Finance Committee, and Rep. John Hostettler, Chairman of the Subcommittee on
Immigration, Border Security and Claims of the House Judiciary Committee. The
two chairmen had requested that the OIG investigate the actions of U.S. Customs
and Immigration Services (USCIS) in regard to the provision of H1-B
non-immigrant status. More H1-B visas were issued in FY 2005 than were
authorized, and the chairmen specifically requested that the OIG how this
over-issuance occurred and whether it was a deliberately done in violation of
federal law. The OIG investigated this matter and found that USCIS officials at
all levels had attempted to comply with regulations regarding the cap of H1-B
visas, but that USCIS did not have the technology or the operational methods to
guarantee that the issuance of these visas did not exceed or fall short of the
regulatory limit. According to the report from the OIG, the practice of USCIS
officials was to avoid issuing too few visas. The agency took all petitions that
were submitted before a certain deadline, an act that made the number of
petitions granted inexact. In addition, a surprising amount of petitions
submitted in mid-September 2004 flooded the cap counting process. USCIS has
established several new initiatives that are designed to prevent a recurrence of
H1-B visas being over-issued; however, the OIG believes that they might be
insufficient to meet the precision currently required by federal law.
*****
Former
Bracero guest workers who worked in the
United States
between 1942 and 1964 will
receive a one-time payment of about $3,500, or 38,000 pesos, in compensation for
paychecks withheld for savings or pension funds that were originally supposed to
be paid in
Mexico
but never were. The
Associate Press reports that about 10 percent of the group’s paychecks were
withheld as an incentive for those workers to return to
Mexico
, but that the money to be
paid simply disappeared. The Association of Border Workers in
El Paso
representative Guillermo
Glenn stated that the “money should have been reimbursed a long time ago with
interest” because the families to whom the money was owed need more than what
they are being given. Activists and the former workers have held many protests,
marches, and even seized President Vicente Fox’s ranch in Guanajuato to demand
compensation. The rules for receiving compensation are as follows: Each former
worker has up to four months to claim the one-time payment owed to him or her,
and the worker must submit pay stubs, work visas, labor contracts, or other
supporting documents. Surviving spouses or children can collect the payment by
presenting the same documents in the case that the former worker has died.
Priority for receiving the payment will be given to the oldest workers and to
those who worked between 1942 and 1946.
*****
U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services issued a notice on FBI Name Check Expedite
Criteria in January of this year. According to the notice, in order for USCIS to
expedite an FBI Name Check request, one of five criteria must be met: Military
deployment must be imminent, age-out benefits, a Writ of Mandamus (lawsuit
pending in Federal Court), Immigration Judge cases (grant of lawful permanent
residence), and/or compelling reasons that the requesting office must provide
(i.e. critical medical conditions) that are assessed on a case by case basis.
These requirements have implications for cases where security checks are a
problem.
*****
In
a letter from
LTC
Pamela L. Hart, an Army
spokeswoman, Ms. Hart details the Army’s current enlistment practices.
LTC
Hart states that the U.S.
Army’s policy is to enlist only citizens and permanent legal residents of the
U.S.
, but that exceptions are
made, especially during times of war. According to Hart, commanders determine
the appropriate action to be taken should a soldier be enlisted erroneously or
fraudulently. The commander’s evaluation should include the soldier’s
service record. A commander can recommend that an exception be made for a
soldier who has served with meritorious conduct, but who enlisted fraudulently,
that the soldier remain in the service. The President’s Expedited
Naturalization Executive Order,
July 3, 2002
, states that soldiers who
are not
U.S.
citizens and who served in
such places as
Iraq
,
Kuwait
,
Afghanistan
, and
Korea
can apply for
United States
citizenship. This law also
permits “expedited processing” on the soldier’s application. A similar
provision of law allowed expedited processing for non-U.S. citizen service
members of World Wars I and II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War.
LTC
Hart affirms that,
“during times of military conflict, the privilege to serve in the Armed Forces
is not and has not historically been limited to citizens.”
*****
An
interoffice memorandum of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has
issued procedures for calculating the maximum period of stay for those visas
(H-1B and L-1) that have limitations on admission. According to the memo, time
spent outside the
United States
during the time limitation
of a visa would count toward the “maximum period of time in the
United States
.” Visa-holders worried
that they would not be able to “recapture” the time spent in departures from
the
U.S.
for such events as
vacation. The decision set forth in the memo states that time spent outside the
U.S.
during the validity of a
visa may be added back to the period of stay allowed by the visa. The burden of
proof is on the visa-holder, however, who must show that he or she was outside
the
U.S.
for the period of time
requested. In addition, spouses and minor children of a principal immigrant who
recaptures time on his or her visa period may also receive extensions of visa
periods for H-4 and L-2 petitions.
Under
the Immigration and Nationality Act, the period of stay of a nonimmigrant may
not exceed six years, and any nonimmigrant that has spent those six years may
not seek extension, a change of status, or be readmitted to the United States
unless the nonimmigrant has been outside of the U.S. for the duration of one
year immediately prior to reapplication, with exceptions made for business trips
and pleasure trips. In addition the INA states that the period of stay for a
nonimmigrant to render services in a managerial or executive capacity cannot
exceed seven years, and a nonimmigrant who is admitted because s/he renders
services in an area that requires specialized knowledge cannot exceed a period
of stay of more than five years. These non-immigrants may not be readmitted to
the
United States
until they have been out of
the country for one year immediately prior to their reapplication for admission.
Overall, any days spent outside of the
U.S.
during the duration of an
H-1B or L-1 visa can be recaptured and will not be counted toward the maximum
period of stay, provided that the applicant can submit the appropriate evidence
that s/he was physically out of the
U.S.
during the time period
specified. The burden of proof rests with the applicant.
*****
Texas
Attorney General Greg Abbott has put a stop to a web site advertising legal
advice and immigrations services that it is not authorized to provide.
Abbott filed an injunction against Naim Haroon, who operates Sakhia and
Associates. More than $260,000 was
frozen in bank accounts, and a trial is scheduled for January 2006.
Abbott
states that
Texas
law is clear in prohibiting
individuals from falsely claiming to be able to provide legal services to those
who are seeking immigration assistance. Haroon’s
web site advertised assistance with business visas to prospective immigrants
looking to enter the
U.S.
It also falsely claimed
that Haroon is authorized to prepare immigration paperwork.
By
Texas
law, only licensed
attorneys and authorized non-profit organizations are authorized to provide
assistance in immigration related matters.
Since assuming office, Abbot has stopped more than two dozen businesses
that falsely claimed to be able to provide immigration assistance.