Last
April the INS issued a proposed rule that would limit tourist visa stays to 30
days unless the visitor could justify to an INS examiner why a longer stay is
justified. The INS explained that security concerns justified the rule. The
rationale of the agency is that it would
b
e easier to
keep track of people if they were staying for shorter periods in the
US
.
That
proposed rule came under fire from a num
b
er of groups
and individuals, particularly from the tourist industry. More than 10,000
comments were received
b
y the INS and
even Florida Governor Je
b
Bush, the
b
rother of
President Bush, openly criticized the proposal. Now a coalition of groups has
sent acting INS Commissioner
Michael
Garcia asking
the INS to pe
rm
anently ta
b
le the
proposal. The group is comprised of the following organizations:
American Hotel &
Lodging Association
American Immigration Lawyers Association
National Association of Home Builders
National Association of Realtors
Travel
Indu
stry Association of
America
U.S.
Cham
b
er of Commerce
The group m
ak
es several arguments to
justify killing the rule:
·
The proposed
rule would deter international travel to the
U.S.
b
y creating uncertainty a
b
out the actual admission
period.
·
The proposed
rule would increase the likelihood that travelers would
ina
dvertently overstay their
admission.
·
The
proposed rule would render the
U.S.
less attractive to potential investors.
·
The
proposed rule would negatively impact the residential real estate industry.
- The
proposed rule would negatively impact or deter
Can
adian
visitors
- The
proposed rule would severely circumscri
b
e
the a
b
ility
of mul
t
ina
tional
employers to use the B-1 for longer-te
rm
b
usiness
trips.
The
group also had specific suggestions to modify the proposal if, indeed, it is f
ina
lized. At a minimum, the INS
should provide c
lea
r guidance to visitors m
ak
ing their travel plans
concerning what they will need for their admission to the
US
. The INS should maintain a
minimum period of admission, perhaps 90 days, so as not to deter international
travel and tourism. The rule should not change current laws with regard to
extending a stay. The INS should not drop the current maximum period of stay
from one year. And it should provide a specific exemption for "seasonal or
occasional" homeowners and renters.