House Immigration Subcommittee Chairman George Gekas, a Republican from Pennsylvania, has introduced a sweeping immigration restriction bill that includes dramatic reductions in immigrant visa numbers and a number of new restrictions on immigrants – both legal and illegal – as well as employers who hire illegal immigrants. H.R. 5013, the Securing America’s Future through Enforcement Reform Act (SAFER), would also make it a federal crime to overstay a visa by more than six months, potentially making tens of thousands of illegal aliens into wanted criminals. The bill also contains several provisions that target terrorists, suspected terrorists and those who support terrorists.
Gekas appears to be interested in capitalizing on a perceived anti-immigrant mood in the country following September 11th. However, the bill’s biggest losers will be in the nation’s Hispanic immigrants. Republicans will no doubt be extremely cautious in dealing with this legislation. Republican support for similar measures in the past has been directly blamed for costing Republicans crucial elections in key states such as Florida, California and Texas . President Bush has also been actively courting Hispanic voters and the Gekas bill will likely be perceived negatively by the White House. Neverthelless, Gekas’ role as chairman of the House’s immigration subcommittee will no doubt mean the bill will be given a high profile this session.
Gekas appears to be employing a strategy similar to the strategy that was used by Republicans on the Immigration Subcommittee during the push for passage of the IIRAIRA immigration reform act in 1996. In that bill, very popular provisions punishing criminal aliens and illegal aliens were combined with provisions that dramatically curtailed legal immigration. The hope was that members of Congress would be afraid to oppose a measure cracking down on illegal immigration and would accept measures curtailing legal immigration to avoid being portrayed as soft on illegal aliens. Instead, members of Congress favoring immigrants were able to split the legal immigration provisions out of the bill and the legal immigration billed quickly died in Congress. In this case, Gekas may be hoping that members of Congress will support the bill to avoid the label of “soft on terrorism.” Whether members of Congress instead decide to split the terrorist provisions into a separate bill remains to be seen.
Among the bill’s major provisions are the following:
– An across the board 20% reduction in legal immigration levels
– Elimination of the annual Diversity Visa green card lottery
– Make it a federal crime to overstay a visa by more than six months
– Require the INS to fully implement the SEVIS student and exchange visitor tracking system in place on time in January or shut down all processing of F-1 and J-1 visas
– Require employers to check the validity of new employees’ social security numbers to verify employment eligibility
– Match voter registration lists against social security lists to make sure voters are really citizens
– Increase the size of the Border Patrol to 16,000
– Track all aliens entering and leaving the US
– Allow for the expedited deportation of aliens who are members of terrorist organizations, support terrorism or solicit funds for terrorist organization
– Require longer term visa holders and permanent residents to be fingerprinted and periodically register their addresses with the INS
– Consulates will have to interview all visa applicants in person (presumably ending visa revalidation by mail for persons in the US as well as drop box and mail in visa applications at consulates in countries with low visa denial rates).
– Bail bondsmen will be allowed to hunt down people who violate the terms of their visas
Disclaimer: This newsletter is provided as a public service and not intended to establish an attorney client relationship. Any reliance on information contained herein is taken at your own risk. The information provided in this article has not been updated since its original posting and you should not rely on it until you consult counsel to determine if the content is still valid. We keep older articles online because it helps in the understanding of the development of immigration law.