Siskind Susser is currently co-counseling in a number of mass immigration litigation matters. If you are a potential client in one of those cases and are looking to participate as a named plaintiff, please follow the instructions linked below. 

Did you miss the deadline for onboarding? Sometimes we have the opportunity to add plaintiffs after a case is filed. To be added to a waiting list for one of our cases, sign up here.

Our current cases include:

  • DV-2022 Delays: Currently Adding Plaintiffs – This case challenges the State Department’s failure to move DV-2022 cases in a timely manner and force the agency to adjudicate cases after the 9/30/2021 deadline if they are unable to get the job done in a timely manner.
  • Fee Refunds: This case is seeking refunds of overcharges on all MRV fees paid by nonimmigrant visa applicants since January 1, 2016 and also seeking fee refunds for people who paid nonimmigrant and immigrant visa fees as well as SEVIS fees and didn’t get visa appointments because of a travel ban (Muslim, NIV, IV or Covid) or were denied a visa because of a travel ban. Onboarding is at https://www.visalaw.com/faq-visa-sevis-fee-litigation/
  • EAD (work permit) processing delays: [Not adding plaintiffs].  USCIS is often taking more than 180 days to adjudicate applications for employment authorization, leaving applicants at risk of losing their jobs, health insurance, and drivers’ licenses. 
  • Indian and Chinese Delayed EB-1/EB-2/EB-3 Adjustment of Status cases (Chakrabarti v. USCIS)[Not adding plaintiffs] – If USCIS fails to adjudicate cases by September 30, 2021, as many as 100,000 green cards may go unused and disappear. This case will seek to force USCIS to issue those visas by then or reserve the visas so they are not lost if the deadline passes. 
  • H-1B Lottery (Liu v. Mayorkas) – [Not adding plaintiffs] This case will challenge the USCIS policy of allowing individuals to file multiple H-1B petitions with multiple employers as well as other aspects of the online H-1B lottery registration.
  • K-1 London (King v. Blinken) – [Not adding plaintiffs]. This case challenges K-1 processing delays at the US Consulate in London. 
  • K-1 Moscow (Ponomarenko v. Blinken) – [Not adding plaintiffs] – This case challenges K-1 visa processing delays at the US consulate in Moscow, Russia.
  • DV-2021 Delays (Goh v. Blinken) [Not adding plaintiffs] – This case challenges the State Department’s failure to move DV-2021 cases in a timely manner and force the agency to adjudicate cases after the 9/30/2021 deadline if they are unable to get the job done in a timely manner.
  • K-1 Philippines (Ramirez v. Blinken) – [Not adding plaintiffs] – This case challenges K-1 visa processing delays at the US consulate in Manila, Philippines.
  • Travel Ban litigation (Kinsley v. Blinken) – [Not adding plaintiffs] – We are challenging the ability of the State Department to deny visas based on regional travel bans (Schengen area, Brazil, China, India, Iran, Ireland, South Africa and the UK). 
  • K-1 Brazil (Penn v. Blinken)– [Not adding plaintiffs] – This case challenges K-1 visa processing delays at the US consulate in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • K-1 Egypt(Yacoub v. Blinken)- [Not adding plaintiffs] -This case challenges K-1 visa processing delays at the US consulate in Cairo, Egypt.
  • Egyptian spouses of US citizens(Abdelwahed v. Blinken) – [Not adding plaintiffs] – This case challenges immigrant visa processing delays at the US consulate in Cairo, Egypt. 
  • EB-5 Consular Processing(Fang v. Blinken) -[Not adding plaintiffs] -This case will challenge EB-5 immigrant visa processing delays at consulates around the world.
  • Milligan v. Pompeo – [Not adding plaintiffs] This case challenges K-1 fiancé(e) visa delays across the world.
  • Tate v. Pompeo  – [Not adding plaintiffs] This case challenges the O-1 visa delays.
  • Anunciato v. Trump – [Not adding plaintiffs] This case challenged the Trump Administration’s immigrant visa ban (Presidential Proclamation 10014) and visa processing delays.
  • Purdue University v. Scalia – [Not adding plaintiffs] We have filed a case challenging the US Department of Labor over a new rule that dramatically hikes wages for H-1B, H-1B1, E-3 and PERM cases.

Find Similar Language

I Accept

This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. If you continue using our website, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website and you agree to our Privacy Policy.